2013
DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v20i1.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time for research networks to be trained in informatics and based within informatics centres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst our ontology was created to be as comprehensive as possible, it is limited by the fact that some concepts are not present in the Read code terminology, whilst other are non-specific or do not sufficiently differentiate between acute and chronic. Also of note, the NHS in England is to change from using Read codes to using the SNOMED CT by April 2018, and Read codes had stopped being updated at the time of this study [ 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst our ontology was created to be as comprehensive as possible, it is limited by the fact that some concepts are not present in the Read code terminology, whilst other are non-specific or do not sufficiently differentiate between acute and chronic. Also of note, the NHS in England is to change from using Read codes to using the SNOMED CT by April 2018, and Read codes had stopped being updated at the time of this study [ 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 65 ] PCRNs have yet to document the extent to which they have created social and intellectual capital, which might soon be lost as they are amalgamated into comprehensive research networks. The case for investment in structural capital, particularly better use of informatics, has been made on the basis that this may be one of the biggest bars to recruitment [ 66 ]. A Canadian series on research networks emphasises the central role of the EPR in research [ 67 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SNOMED CT is a clinical terminology, and has been adopted by the NHS for use as a coding standard. However, concerns have been raised regarding its complexity having a detrimental impact on finding data coded to it [52]. MeSH is more intuitive to biomedical researchers and has been shown to be capable of annotating all GWAS phenotypes at an informative level of granularity, albeit at a coarser granularity than originally described in some cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%