Time for a New Paradigm? Past and Present Transitions in Economic Policy

Abstract

This article seeks to place the UK's present economic ‘moment’ in historical context. Over the course of the decade since the 2007 financial crisis, it has increasingly been acknowledged that a cyclical crisis has become a structural crisis. The failure of most economists to predict the financial crash in the first place, and the inadequacy of economic policy in responding to its lasting effects, has led many to conclude that economics itself is in crisis. This article seeks to contribute to a better understanding of the present period of disjuncture. Drawing on theories of paradigm shift from both the physical and social sciences, we argue that the speed of change in UK economic policy is comparable to the two major historical transitions that ended with the post‐war consensus and neoliberalism. We conclude by offering some remarks on how and where the present change might take us.

Independent Regulatory Authorities in India: A Comparative Perspective

“…Now a rethinking, a restructuring, in the quest of alternatives too seems to be surfacing. Take for example Sterling and Laybourn-Langton (2017) who argue that there have been two significant major periods of breakdown and necessary transitions since the beginning of the 20th century: (a) the period between the financial shock and global depression at the end of the 1920s and the post-World War II creation of the Brettonwoods institutions and the Keynsian liberal political economy paradigm and (b) the period between the currency and oil shocks during the 1960s and the 1970s producing neoliberalism or free market economic policies since the 1980s onwards. They see a new period of breakdown now, the answers to which are still awaited.…”

From ‘There is No Alternative’ to ‘Maybe There are Alternatives’: five Challenges to Economic Orthodoxy after the Crash

“…This can be observed in a recent article, for example, which argues that while there have been significant 'anomalies' in the neoliberal paradigm in the post-2008 period, these 'merely serve to sustain the existing orthodoxy'. 10 The second is to seek to build a new paradigm to replace the present paradigm, an ambition that both grassroots and elite actors in and close to the Labour Party have committed to in recent years. In 2012 Ed Miliband was described as wanting nothing less than 'to create a new paradigm'.…”

From Maggie to May: Forty Years of (De)industrial Strategy

“…Theresa May's subsequent embrace of industrial policy, with its implicit acceptance of a positive role for government in shaping the economy and promoting competitive advantage, has been presented as a 'significant departure' portending the 'reversal of the previously hands-off approach to industrial policy' over the last forty years. 2 The May government's industrial strategy, published as a November 2017 White Paper, 3 undoubtedly exhibits some novel features. Nonetheless this article contends that this policy shift is less dramatic than it appears.…”