2020
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time‐efficient measurement of subtle blood–brain barrier leakage using a T1 mapping MRI protocol at 7 T

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we obtained the VIF from the SSS, which was previously found favorable due to a higher consistency 36 . The latter study using 7T DCE‐MRI showed comparable K i and v p values of WM and GM with our current study 37 . Note that the study by van den Kerkhof et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, we obtained the VIF from the SSS, which was previously found favorable due to a higher consistency 36 . The latter study using 7T DCE‐MRI showed comparable K i and v p values of WM and GM with our current study 37 . Note that the study by van den Kerkhof et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Previously, with data acquired at 3T, more accurate leakage results could be obtained with such long acquisition times, 19,41 and most current DCE‐MRI studies at 3T have acquisition times between 20 and 30 min, 6,11,18,31 similar to our continuous sampling DCE‐MRI sequence at 7T. Also, in another 7T MRI study, it was shown that a sparsely time‐sampled DCE‐MRI protocol with a time interval of approximately 20 min could detect subtle BBB leakage 37 . In the future, the sensitivity for detecting subtle BBB leakage at shorter acquisition times should also be investigated with our continuously sampling DCE‐MRI protocol to see whether the acquisition time can be shortened.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…More details about the scan parameters and this protocol are reported in Table S1 and Kerkhof et al (2021). 11 For optimal segmentation of grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM), a T2-weighted fluid–attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence (TR/TE/TI = 8000/303/2330 ms; cubic voxel size: 1 mm, acquisition time: 6:59 min:s) was acquired in between the two postcontrast T1-maps. Additionally, for the rating of microbleeds and perivascular spaces (PVS), a susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) sequence was acquired before contrast administration, and T2-weighted images were acquired after contrast administration, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, we proposed a highly sensitive DCE-method at 7 Tesla, where instead of the commonly continuously acquired T1-weighted images, only two quantitative post-contrast T1-maps were acquired. 11 In the current study, we investigated the relation between hypertension, blood pressure and BBB leakage in human subjects. Therefore, we applied the sparsely time-sampled, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI protocol to patients with essential hypertension and normotensive, healthy controls, to investigate group differences in BBB leakage rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation