2008
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/10/016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-domain finite-difference/finite-element hybrid simulations of radio frequency coils in magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract: A hybrid method that combines the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method and the finite-element time-domain (FETD) method is presented for simulating radio-frequency (RF) coils in magnetic resonance imaging. This method applies a high-fidelity FETD method to RF coils, while the human body is modeled with a low-cost FDTD method. Since the FDTD and the FETD methods are applied simultaneously, the dynamic interaction between RF coils and the human body is fully accounted for. In order to simplify the treatme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Average and local SARs inside the human head were simulated under our experimental conditions using a custom-designed finite difference in time domain/finite element method (FDTD/FEM) program developed in-house (20,21). In FEM, the birdcage coil was modeled according to the actual dimensions with unstructured tetrahedral meshes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Average and local SARs inside the human head were simulated under our experimental conditions using a custom-designed finite difference in time domain/finite element method (FDTD/FEM) program developed in-house (20,21). In FEM, the birdcage coil was modeled according to the actual dimensions with unstructured tetrahedral meshes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At low fields, the Biot‐Savart generates results with reasonable accuracy to the solution of the Maxwell's equations. At high field strengths it is necessary to solve rigorously Maxwell's equations (35). Results of this study also provide confidence to the argument against inaccurate computation of magnetic fields using Maxwell's equation in XFdtd, as reported earlier (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to nonoptimal filling factors, and thus nonoptimal B 1 ‐field penetration response for such simulations. Despite the versatility of the employed electromagnetic full‐wave simulation package employed, stringent memory requirements are imposed by full‐wave FDTD electromagnetic modeling calculations that increase exponentially as cell size is reduced, often becoming computationally intensive (35). However, such FDTD calculations are relatively fast and range between 15 and 20 mins on a desktop computer using an Intel processor [Intel(R) Core (TM) Duo CPU], depending on the loading conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we note that due to the different mesh structures used in the Cartesian and cylindrical coordinate systems, there are some differences between the two conductivity maps, particularly around the periphery of the skull. This leads to some differences in the specific absorption rate (SAR) simulation but has less impact on the magnetic fields, as electric fields can be disturbed more significantly than magnetic fields inside the biological sample [14].…”
Section: Mri Application: Surface Coil-human Head Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%