Applied Time Series Analysis II 1981
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-256420-8.50014-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TIME DOMAIN CONSIDERATIONS IN OPTIMAL ESTIMATION FOR BANDLIMITED SIGNALS**This work was supported by NSF Grant #ENG-780903.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hounds for o} and 02' some of which are given in Table I, evidently do not meet; their role is only to fix roughly the range of accurate extrapolatability. Table I also shows that this range is not very accurately estimated by considerations of the Nyquist rate [8], which would suggest that (J -(a -1 -1)/2.…”
Section: Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The hounds for o} and 02' some of which are given in Table I, evidently do not meet; their role is only to fix roughly the range of accurate extrapolatability. Table I also shows that this range is not very accurately estimated by considerations of the Nyquist rate [8], which would suggest that (J -(a -1 -1)/2.…”
Section: Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Analogously to the definition of r(O, 1), let and applying Schwarz's inequality, we find On expanding F( w) in its Fourier series, we obtain the series converging in norm, and the Fourier transform of this series yields the sampling expansion (1). In (1) the series converges in norm by (6), hence also uniformly by (8). The construction shows that (sin 'IT( t -k )j'IT( t -k)} form a complete orthonormal set in 9/2 ('IT), that while However, and choosing D so that it intersects the reals in an interval barely larger than [ -1,0], the first integral approaches a finite negative value, while the second approaches zero.…”
Section: Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…l ) , the fundamental non-uniqueness of this exercise, induced by data incompleteness, is sometimes obscured in the discussion (with some welcome exceptions; e.g. Slepian 1978, Parks andKolba 1981). As reviewed below, for some x not equal to any x,, any prediction valuef(s) is compatible with membership in B(u) and the data constraints (1.1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%