1992
DOI: 10.1016/0955-7997(92)90039-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-domain analyses of three-dimensional dam-reservoir interactions by BEM and semi-analytical method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After conducting the analysis, the sensitivity of seismic responses of horizontal displacement of the dam crest, the maximum and minimum principal stresses in the toe and heel of the dam and the maximum hydrodynamic pressure in the reservoir related to Ÿ parameter were extracted using ANSYS Software. The sensitivity of seismic responses to Ÿ parameter affected by EL Centro Earthquake have been represented in figures (3) to (7).…”
Section: Model Analysis and Results Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After conducting the analysis, the sensitivity of seismic responses of horizontal displacement of the dam crest, the maximum and minimum principal stresses in the toe and heel of the dam and the maximum hydrodynamic pressure in the reservoir related to Ÿ parameter were extracted using ANSYS Software. The sensitivity of seismic responses to Ÿ parameter affected by EL Centro Earthquake have been represented in figures (3) to (7).…”
Section: Model Analysis and Results Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saini et al (1978) [2] and Chopra and Chakrabarti (1981) [3] studied the dam-reservoir interaction problem in the frequency domain using the finite element model. Finite element analyses in time-domain were performed by 1986) [4][5][6] and Tsai et al (1992) [7]. For the reservoir with irregular geometry, numerical methods such as finite element method must be used, because an analytical solution cannot obtain the results for the arbitrary boundary and geometry of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dams are among the most significant engineering buildings, the resistance of these against severe earthquake loads will prevent catastrophic damages on humans, ecology, and economy. Therefore, the dynamic analysis of dams has previously been studied using a variety of methodologies, including the Boundary Element Method (BEM) (Domínguez and Medina 1989;Medina and Domínguez 1989;Dominguez and Meise 1991;Tsai et al 1992;Maeso and Domínguez 1993;Küçükarslan 2004b;Küçükarslan 2004a), Finite Element Method (FEM) (Chopra and Chakrabarti 1971;Gutierrez and Chopra 1978;Akkas et al 1979;Hacıefendioğlu et al 2007;Hacıefendioğlu 2009;Akköse and Şimşek 2010;Bayraktar et al 2011;Azizan et al 2017;Gorai and Maity 2021), and FEM-BEM (Touhei and Ohmachi 1994;Abouseeda and Dakoulas 1998;Yaseri and Konrad 2021). The reservoir domain has been modeled by using Eulerian (Chopra and Chakrabarti 1971;Gogoi and Maity 2007;Alembagheri 2016;Gorai and Maity 2019), Lagrangian (Akkas et al 1979;Wilson and Khalvati 1983;Hacıefendioğlu 2009;Akköse and Şimşek 2010;Bayraktar et al 2011;Hacıefendioğlu et al 2012) or Added Mass (Westergaard 1933;Kuo 1982;Zhang et al 2013) approach and boundary condition (Sommerfeld 1949;Sharan 1985;Higdon 1991;Kellezi 2000;Pelecanos et al 2013;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saini et al (1978) [13] and Chopra -Chakrabarti (1981) [5] studied the dam-reservoir interaction problem in the frequency domain using the finite element model. Finite element analyses in time-domain were performed by 1986) [14, 15 and 16] and Tsai et al (1992) [17]. For the reservoir with irregular geometry, numerical methods such as finite element method must be used, because an analytical solution cannot achieve results for the arbitrary boundary and geometry of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%