2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3465413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time Discounting and Wealth Inequality

Abstract: This paper documents a large association between individuals' time discounting in incentivized experiments and their positions in the real-life wealth distribution derived from Danish high-quality administrative data for a large sample of middle-aged individuals. The association is stable over time, exists through the wealth distribution and remains large after controlling for education, income profile, school grades, initial wealth, parental wealth, credit constraints, demographics, risk preferences and addit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One prediction is that decision makers can switch from preferring the earlier to the later payment as their wealth increases. In other words, richer people discount less steeply, consistent with empirical findings Epper et al, 2018). Another prediction is that, for small payments, discounting is close to hyperbolic for short delays and close to exponential for long delays.…”
Section: Our Model -Growth Rate Maximizationsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One prediction is that decision makers can switch from preferring the earlier to the later payment as their wealth increases. In other words, richer people discount less steeply, consistent with empirical findings Epper et al, 2018). Another prediction is that, for small payments, discounting is close to hyperbolic for short delays and close to exponential for long delays.…”
Section: Our Model -Growth Rate Maximizationsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…with the findings of Epper et al (2018), that "individuals with relatively low time discounting are consistently positioned higher in the wealth distribution." It is likely consistent with , in which people with higher incomes were observed to discount less steeply.…”
Section: Wealth Effectsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…There is a larger literature focusing on other preference domains (see Section 1.). Note: This graph comes from Epper et al (2019b). It illustrates the mean of the incentivized experimentally elicited patience index by the three options respondents have when answering our time preference question (for details, see Epper et al, 2019b).…”
Section: Table B1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, {η i } 5 i=1 and b 5 are identified from the transition probabilities over the durations longer than two years, as plotted in Figure (2). 20 Finally, the coefficients {a 1 , a 2 , a 3 , a 4 } are used to capture the difference in the transition probabilities between those in bad (or good) health for at least one year vs. two years. The solid lines in Figure ( 2show that our parsimonious model of health captures both the cross-sectional and dynamic moments of health over the life-cycle relatively well.…”
Section: Health Process Specification and Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We convert it to 1996 dollars using the CPI. 40 Specifically, we compute are the estimated coefficients and the residuals from Equation (20). By construction, we remove the variation in net worth due to the variation in family size that is orthogonal to health status and age.…”
Section: The Estimation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%