1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00757247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time dilations in bound muon decay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show the results of the theoretical decay rate changing with the atomic number Z in Table 1, where R exp is the experimental value of the muon decay rate [43]. It can be observed that the experimental values R exp decreases as the atomic number Z increases, and the theoretical values are close to the experimental values when Z is less than 20.…”
Section: The Decay Rate Of Bound Muonsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We show the results of the theoretical decay rate changing with the atomic number Z in Table 1, where R exp is the experimental value of the muon decay rate [43]. It can be observed that the experimental values R exp decreases as the atomic number Z increases, and the theoretical values are close to the experimental values when Z is less than 20.…”
Section: The Decay Rate Of Bound Muonsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…After a lot of data fitting and carefully considered other works (H. Überall [37] and D. Apsel [43], etc), we find ã = αZ,…”
Section: The Decay Rate Of Bound Muonsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Not all redshifts are due to expansion [19]. Besides the three (classical) possible sources for the redshifts of astronomical objects (namely: Doppler effect, cosmological redshift and the [radial] gravitational redshift [20]), the electromagnetic redshift [21] and the new, distinct relativistic redshift that was found theoretically [22], the angular nonradial effect causes nonradial gravitational redshift. Actually, it causes two formally independent redshifts: the tangential and binormal one [6] that complement the usual radial redshift predicted by the GTR.…”
Section: Quotient Of the Angular Nonradial To The Usual Radial Potentmentioning
confidence: 99%