Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks
DOI: 10.1109/icccn.1997.623318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time dependent priority scheduling for guaranteed QoS systems

Abstract: Wath the advances an server technology, and the advent of fast Gzgabat networks, at has become possable to support multa-medza applzcatzons To support the requzrements f o r the transmassaon of asochronous data, the network must provade servace guarantees to connectzons, zncludang mznzmum bandwadth, packet delay, delay jatter, and loss Three factors determine the utalazatzon of the network when provadzng these servaces These are the scheduling algorithm employed at each swztch, the accuracy (tzghtness) of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It serves non-real time data streams. With greater efficiency, it optimizes the throughput and ensures fairness between the data flows [16]. The subcarrier is allocated to the user having most favorable conditions of transmission.…”
Section: Proportional Fairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It serves non-real time data streams. With greater efficiency, it optimizes the throughput and ensures fairness between the data flows [16]. The subcarrier is allocated to the user having most favorable conditions of transmission.…”
Section: Proportional Fairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jackson [2] proposed the dynamic assignment of priority in the form of the sum of the total sojourn time and a parameter assigned to each packet. Kleinrock [3] and Chaudhry and Choudhary [4] proposed time dependent priority, where the priority for each packet is determined by one of several linear functions of packet sojourn times. Lim and Kobza [5] proposed headof-line with priority jump, in which a packet in a given class is reassigned to a higher class after waiting for a particular time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It essentially schedules the packets in a greedy manner which always picks the packets with the closest deadline. Compare with strict priority discipline, we can regard EDF as a scheduling algorithm which provides time-dependent priority [8] to each eligible packet. Actually, the priority of an eligible packet under EDF is an increasing function of time since the sending order in EDF is according to the closeness of packets' deadlines.…”
Section: Earliest Deadline First (Edf)mentioning
confidence: 99%