2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-dependent morphology and adhesion of osteoblastic cells on titanium model surfaces featuring scale-resolved topography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
192
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 298 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
15
192
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, β-Ca 2 SiO 4 scaffolds had rough surface and pores on the struts, which might be the gas release that induced from the reaction during sintering process [2,3]. In fact, the rough surface is benefit for cell adhesion, differentiation and thereby formation of cell matrix [4547]. Therefore, the 3D-printed preceramic polymer-derived scaffolds had a desirable phase of β-Ca 2 SiO 4 and rough surface, which might be promising for bone tissue engineering.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, β-Ca 2 SiO 4 scaffolds had rough surface and pores on the struts, which might be the gas release that induced from the reaction during sintering process [2,3]. In fact, the rough surface is benefit for cell adhesion, differentiation and thereby formation of cell matrix [4547]. Therefore, the 3D-printed preceramic polymer-derived scaffolds had a desirable phase of β-Ca 2 SiO 4 and rough surface, which might be promising for bone tissue engineering.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, useful information can be gained from previous studies that investigated either the role of surface roughness or wettability. At relatively high roughness (submicrometer down to ~100 nm), it is clear that substrate topography influences cell response, the cells responding to roughness by a higher cell thickness and a delayed apparition of the focal contacts [5,35] . At the nanometer scale, Washburn et al [36] showed that the rate of proliferation on the smooth regions of a poly(Llactic acid) film (below 1 nm) is much greater than on the rough regions (around 12 nm).…”
Section: Relative Importance Of Film Stiffness Roughness and Wettabimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the biocompatibility of bone-replacing implant materials is closely related to osteoblast adhesion onto their surface (12)(13)(14). Osteoblast attachment, adhesion and spreading will influence the capacity of these cells to proliferate and to differentiate itself upon contact with the implant.…”
Section: Cellular Interactions With Implant Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%