2020
DOI: 10.1007/s42461-020-00327-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-Dependent Monitoring of Seismic Wave Velocity Variation Associated with Three Major Seismic Events at a Deep, Narrow-Vein Mine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are different findings from other mines. For instance, using passive seismic tomography, Afrouz et al (2021) analysed three seismic events in a mine and found that the P-wave velocity did not increase in the vicinity of the hypocenter for any of the three events. For two of the events, the velocity deceased in the week prior to the event (by 2.1% and 0.8%), and for the third event, the velocity was essentially unchanged from the week prior.…”
Section: Field Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there are different findings from other mines. For instance, using passive seismic tomography, Afrouz et al (2021) analysed three seismic events in a mine and found that the P-wave velocity did not increase in the vicinity of the hypocenter for any of the three events. For two of the events, the velocity deceased in the week prior to the event (by 2.1% and 0.8%), and for the third event, the velocity was essentially unchanged from the week prior.…”
Section: Field Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For two of the events, the velocity deceased in the week prior to the event (by 2.1% and 0.8%), and for the third event, the velocity was essentially unchanged from the week prior. Afrouz et al (2021) explained that a potential reason was that new fractures might be developing within the highly stressed rock mass, resulting in either no increased velocity or a reduction in velocity at the hypocenter prior to the seismic event. In addition, they reported that the three seismic events might be due to the different failure mechanisms, since Events 1 and 3 occurred suddenly followed by several minor events, while Event 2 triggered fewer subsequent minor events but was followed by a major event 17 days later.…”
Section: Field Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%