2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time dependent fatigue crack growth behavior of silica particle reinforced epoxy resin composite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, increasing the content of the curing agent can reduce the breaking strength and fracture resistance of CER. In fact, the crack propagation behavior is mainly controlled by K max , and the pure epoxy also showed the same trend 29 . Therefore, for five samples, S1 showed better crack resistance with K IC = 0.36 MPa mm 1/2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Therefore, increasing the content of the curing agent can reduce the breaking strength and fracture resistance of CER. In fact, the crack propagation behavior is mainly controlled by K max , and the pure epoxy also showed the same trend 29 . Therefore, for five samples, S1 showed better crack resistance with K IC = 0.36 MPa mm 1/2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…From the DCB test it is found that the crack growth rates of the adhesive is comparable to those of epoxy resins [56,60,61,62,63,57,58,59,64], especially those tested in [56,57,58,59].…”
Section: Experimental Demonstration: Test Of Full Scale Research Bladementioning
confidence: 85%
“…1 However, owing to the high cross-linking density after curing of the EP resin, a three-dimensional network structure was formed and large internal stress arises, which lead to brittleness, poor fatigue resistance, low impact resistance, and poor tribological properties, all of which limit the applications of EP resins. The tribological properties of EP material can be improved by adding different solid lubricants and liquid lubricants, such as graphite, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), nanosilica, molybdenum disulfide, ionic liquid (IL), and liquid paraffin, 2 7 which can reduce the contact temperature and form a lubricating film on the contact surface, furthermore to obtain lower friction coefficient. However, due to the tremendous difference of the molecular structure and the incompatibility between the additives and the polymer matrix, a phase separation structure of the composites and a deterioration of the mechanical properties may arise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%