1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0278-5846(97)00038-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-dependent effects of fructose on the modulation of a reactivated memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Limited evidence suggests that the end of the reconsolidation window is likely to be around six hours, but the neurobiology of reconsolidation is largely unknown and not allowing estimations about the start of such a window (e.g. Horne, Rodriguez, Wright, & Padilla, 1997; Rodriguez, Horne,  &  Padilla, 1999; Sara, 2000). In clinical practice and other experimental psychopathology, dual tasks interventions are usually administered during and immediately after memory reactivation (Van den Hout & Engelhard, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited evidence suggests that the end of the reconsolidation window is likely to be around six hours, but the neurobiology of reconsolidation is largely unknown and not allowing estimations about the start of such a window (e.g. Horne, Rodriguez, Wright, & Padilla, 1997; Rodriguez, Horne,  &  Padilla, 1999; Sara, 2000). In clinical practice and other experimental psychopathology, dual tasks interventions are usually administered during and immediately after memory reactivation (Van den Hout & Engelhard, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to those studies using protein-synthesis inhibitors (Judge and Quartermain 1982;Nader et al 2000;Anokhin et al 2002;Sangha et al 2003; for review, see Alberini 2005) other studies were performed in order to test the memory reconsolidation hypothesis using blockers of transcription factors and/or immediate early gene expression (Taubenfeld et al 2001;Kida et al 2002;Bozon et al 2003;Lee et al 2004;Merlo et al 2005), inhibitors of kinases (Kelly et al 2003;Koh and Bernstein 2003), or new potential learning situations (Gordon and Spear 1974;Walker et al 2003;Boccia et al 2005), and only a few studies found evidence of enhancement of memory with post-retrieval treatments (De Vietti et al 1977;Horne et al 1997, Rodriguez et al 1999. This is an important issue if we want to compare consolidation vs. reconsolidation memory processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is accepted that once consolidation is completed, memory becomes permanent (Squire and Alvarez 1995). However, it has also been suggested that reactivation (retrieval) of the original memory again makes it sensitive to disruption, since several post-retrieval treatments impair or enhance it (Misanin et al 1968;DeVietti et al 1977;Horne et al 1997;Rodriguez et al 1999;Sara 2000;Nader 2003). This new period of sensitivity coined the term reconsolidation, suggesting the "reconsolidation" hypothesis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of reconsolidation, it is initiated after reactivation of an existing, consolidated memory representation. As is the case for consolidation, only during the reconsolidation phase can memory be enhanced by "memory enhancers" (Gordon 1977b;Rodriguez et al 1993Rodriguez et al , 1999Horne et al 1997), or impaired by either amnesic treatments (Misanin et al 1968) or interference produced by new learning (Gordon 1977a). These treatments are ineffective when reconsolidation is complete, which is also the case for consolidation.…”
Section: Behavioral Evidence For a Reconsolidation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%