2017
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.24730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time‐dependent density functional theory study on direction‐dependent electron and hole transfer processes in molecular systems

Abstract: We report on real-time time-dependent density functional theory calculations on direction-dependent electron and hole transfer processes in molecular systems. As a model system, we focus on α-sulfur. It is shown that time scale of the electron transfer process from a negatively charged S molecule to a neighboring neutral monomer is comparable to that of a strong infrared-active molecular vibrations of the dimer with one negatively charged monomer. This results in a strong coupling between the electrons and the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the determination of many-particle eigenstates is avoided, and the calculation is reduced to an independent particle problem carried out in real time [26]. Recently, RT-TDDFT was applied [27] to study the charge transfer between the oxidized or reduced a-sulfur monomers and the neighbouring neutral ones. Another recent work used RT-TDDFT to study electron transfer through oligo-p-phenylenevinylene (OPV) and carbon bridged OPV (COPV) [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the determination of many-particle eigenstates is avoided, and the calculation is reduced to an independent particle problem carried out in real time [26]. Recently, RT-TDDFT was applied [27] to study the charge transfer between the oxidized or reduced a-sulfur monomers and the neighbouring neutral ones. Another recent work used RT-TDDFT to study electron transfer through oligo-p-phenylenevinylene (OPV) and carbon bridged OPV (COPV) [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CAM-B3LYP hybrid, range-separated functional ensures the correct asymptotic behavior of the exchange energy and has been successfully applied to study long-range charge transfer processes between neighboring molecules. [34][35][36][37][38] Particularly, the empirical parameters in CAM-B3LYP have been originally optimized to predict, among other properties, correct charge-transfer excited state energies. [33] Additionally, to correctly account for charge transfer processes in anions, it is generally important to use diffuse functions in the employed basis sets, like the one used in this work for optical and charge transfer calculations, i. e. 6-31 + G(d).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All optical and charge‐transfer properties were investigated using the linear‐response time‐dependent DFT (LR‐TDDFT) using the CAM‐B3LYP functional with the 6‐31+G(d) basis set. The CAM‐B3LYP hybrid, range‐separated functional ensures the correct asymptotic behavior of the exchange energy and has been successfully applied to study long‐range charge transfer processes between neighboring molecules . Particularly, the empirical parameters in CAM‐B3LYP have been originally optimized to predict, among other properties, correct charge‐transfer excited state energies .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herein, we study the electron transfer processes between the diamondoid and the nucleotides using a real-time approach to the TDDFT (RT-TDDFT) as implemented in NWChem . The RT-TDDFT method has been successfully employed to investigate the charge transfer between organic and inorganic molecules. , The Ahlrichs Coulomb fitting basis set is used in the RT-TDDFT simulations to compute the Coulomb part of the Fock matrix . The initial charge configurations of the complexes are constructed by combining the ground-state molecular orbitals of separate individual molecules, where one of the molecules has a −1.0 charge, while the other is neutral.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%