2020
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.101.022107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-dependent classification of protein diffusion types: A statistical detection of mean-squared-displacement exponent transitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We just could use some additional information about the G proteins in order to indicate if the classifiers work reasonably or not. Second, real trajectories are often heterogeneous, meaning that a particle may change its type of motion within a single trajectory [69]. Thus the classifiers fed with homogeneous synthetic data may be not the best choice to work with such data.…”
Section: Empirical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We just could use some additional information about the G proteins in order to indicate if the classifiers work reasonably or not. Second, real trajectories are often heterogeneous, meaning that a particle may change its type of motion within a single trajectory [69]. Thus the classifiers fed with homogeneous synthetic data may be not the best choice to work with such data.…”
Section: Empirical Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scaling of trajectories in the training data set has introduced significant changes in the results (please compare Tables 12 and 14), thus the properties of particular features should be further examined (for example, their normalisation). Moreover, in [69], the authors showed that the trajectories in the analysed data set change their character during the time evolution. Different features used in the classifiers probably capture slightly different characteristics of the trajectories; thus, the sensitivity of features for the heterogeneity of movement should be verified.…”
Section: Random Forest Gradient Boostingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Really, if the motion is driven by the fractional Brownian motion, then the best among the available methods is the one based on the p-VAR test, especially for longer trajectories. But, if the particle dynamics can be described by the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck or diffusive Brownian motion process, then the method yielding the smallest errors is based on the MAX test [102][103][104][105]. Following the procedure, we use the statistical test:…”
Section: G-proteins Vs A2ar Receptors From the Analysis Of The Spt Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible transitions of the particles' diffusion type within single trajectories are noted and investigated. For example, in [104] it has been proposed a statistical procedure for detecting transitions of the MSD exponent value within a single trajectory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD is a mature area and has been applied to a wide range of applications, including speech processing [ 33 , 34 ], image processing [ 35 ], analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) and electrocardiogram (ECG) signals [ 36 , 37 , 38 ], and geophysics [ 35 ]. They have also been used in the context of SPT to segment trajectories based on model type, most commonly to distinguish between free and confined modes of motion [ 39 , 40 , 41 ]. CD methods use a threshold on a detection (residual) signal to indicate when a change has occurred and their performance depends heavily on the choice of that level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%