2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2013.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-dependent changes in the obstruction pattern during drug-induced sleep endoscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(ii) As a UA collapsibility evaluation method, DISE itself has some limitations, such as controversy about the reliability of observed obstructive sites, 48 that it might not improve surgical success rates, 49 and variable findings with prolonged observation time or different sedative drugs. 44,50 Dexmedetomidine was used for sedation, and differences in tongue base collapse related to propofol or midazolam use have already been identified. Nevertheless, the velum collapse pattern was similar in response to the three drugs, 51 enabling extension of the findings in this study to DISE with these drugs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) As a UA collapsibility evaluation method, DISE itself has some limitations, such as controversy about the reliability of observed obstructive sites, 48 that it might not improve surgical success rates, 49 and variable findings with prolonged observation time or different sedative drugs. 44,50 Dexmedetomidine was used for sedation, and differences in tongue base collapse related to propofol or midazolam use have already been identified. Nevertheless, the velum collapse pattern was similar in response to the three drugs, 51 enabling extension of the findings in this study to DISE with these drugs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hong demonstrated that increasing sedation (mean BIS concentration increasing from 77.4± 4.5 to 61.9±6.9) increased the severity of obstruction but did not induce additional obstruction sites [15]. On the other hand, Heo showed that prolonging the examination, and thereby increasing the total dose of Midazolam, could increase the number of obstruction sites (soft palate, pharyngeal walls, and base of the tongue) and the obstruction severity and also change the obstruction mechanism [16]. It is difficult to determine the individual target concentration for each patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…DISE was performed as described previously. 8 It was performed at an outpatient clinic by the same otorhinolaryngologist for all patients to prevent technical variations. The nasal mucosa was topically anesthetized and shrunk using gauze soaked with lidocaine (4%) and epinephrine (0.1%).…”
Section: Drug-induced Sleep Endoscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 Moreover, it shows the obstruction pattern during sleep, unlike the Müller maneuver or cephalometry, and it is performed without radiation exposure unlike video fluoroscopy or multidetector computed tomography. 8,9 Moreover, DISE has also been reported to be a useful tool to predict the effect of MAD on OSA when a modified jaw-thrust maneuver (MJTM) is performed during DISE because MAD and MJTM utilize the same mechanism, namely, the protrusion of the mandible. 6,10 In the clinical setting, however, the MJTM may cause pain and discomfort even when performed gently, and may affect the depth of sedation due to discomfort even during DISE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%