1987
DOI: 10.2514/3.9722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-dependent behavior of a reattaching shear layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
109
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
21
109
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] One of its features is the complexity of turbulent structures. The flow just downstream of the step has a similar flow structure to the plainmixing layer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] One of its features is the complexity of turbulent structures. The flow just downstream of the step has a similar flow structure to the plainmixing layer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, this very low frequency range (n ≤ 0.2) is sometimes attributed to the "flapping" phenomenon (see e.g. in [9]). It is interesting to notice that for the uncontrolled case the spatial extent of this region (with n ≤ 0.2) corresponds fairly well with the extent of the mean secondary recirculation region [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time series of pressure fluctuations are also shown in Figures 9(a,c). The spectra in the saddle plane have a low-frequency peak due to the flapping of the separated shear-layer, typical of the reattachment region of flows with separation, such as backward facing steps (Eaton & Johnston 1982;Driver et al 1987;Dejoan & Leschziner 2004;Aider & Danet 2006); St = 0.011 for the in-phase alignment, 0.021 for the staggered case. The state of the boundary layer approaching the crest may play a role in this di↵erence, in that in the staggered case, the boundary layer approaching the saddle plane is coming from the upstream lobe.…”
Section: Near-wall Turbulencementioning
confidence: 99%