Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1864708.1864767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time dependency of data quality for collaborative filtering algorithms

Abstract: The efficiency of personal suggestions generated by collaborative filtering techniques is highly dependent on the quality and quantity of the available consumption data. Extending data sets with additional consumption data (from the past) might enrich the user profiles and generally leads to more accurate recommendations. Although if a considerable amount of profile information is already available and detailed personal preferences can be derived, supplementary consumption data may not have any (or a very limi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One exception to this is the matrix factorization algorithm in the MT dataset. As already observed before in the literature [De Pessemier et al 2010;Campos et al 2011], recommendation performance increases in the MovieLens datasets when more ratings are available, but this is not the case with the MovieTweetings dataset, where all the recommenders, except the matrix factorization method, decrease or maintain their performance. A similar result was observed in [Said et al 2009], where a dataset with several new items was used, which lowered the recommendation precision.…”
Section: Benchmarking Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…One exception to this is the matrix factorization algorithm in the MT dataset. As already observed before in the literature [De Pessemier et al 2010;Campos et al 2011], recommendation performance increases in the MovieLens datasets when more ratings are available, but this is not the case with the MovieTweetings dataset, where all the recommenders, except the matrix factorization method, decrease or maintain their performance. A similar result was observed in [Said et al 2009], where a dataset with several new items was used, which lowered the recommendation precision.…”
Section: Benchmarking Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…In this paper, we adopt a testing methodology similar to the one adopted in [4]. For each dataset, all user historical selections are chronologically split into a training set and a testing set, with the most recent ones (10%) in testing set while the remaining (90%) as input data (Input data is not equivalent to the training set, as explained later on).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One related study on the impact of such timeliness of data (and the effect of inclusion of old data in particular) is the work of Pessemier et al [4]. Their work studied the impact of inclusion of older data on recommendation accuracy in neighbor-based CF algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proper functioning of a recommender system depends on the availability of consistent, correct, and comprehensive data sources [6]. Specific personal preferences and user constraints, which are characteristic for the domain of traveling, emphasize the importance of data quality.…”
Section: Data Structurementioning
confidence: 99%