1981
DOI: 10.1109/tassp.1981.1163555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time delay estimation using phase data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
87
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
87
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…where m is the number of the pairs of both phase and frequency values used for the regression analysis [25]. The selection of the appropriate frequency linearization range is vital due to fluctuations of the phase characteristics above the cut-off frequency band of the recorded signals.…”
Section: The Analysis Of Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where m is the number of the pairs of both phase and frequency values used for the regression analysis [25]. The selection of the appropriate frequency linearization range is vital due to fluctuations of the phase characteristics above the cut-off frequency band of the recorded signals.…”
Section: The Analysis Of Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Bendat (1980) 41 and in Piersol (1981) 44 the random error in the phase estimates due to statistical sampling is given in terms of the standard deviation of the estimated phase angle, θ xy (f ), by…”
Section: Phase Angle Standard Deviationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is detailed in a number of papers [Piersol, 1981, andChan, Hattin, andPlant, 1978]. If only two sensors are present, a received pulse will be seen on each as:…”
Section: DL Pulse Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases a reasonably accurate model for the spatial coherence of the noise field may be obtained. The model can be incorporated into the processing to correct for noise coherence [Piersol, 1981].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%