1984
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.10.1.75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time course of visual information utilization during fixations in reading.

Abstract: 16 undergraduates read short texts from a cathode-ray tube as their eye movements were being monitored. During selected fixations, the text was briefly masked and then it reappeared with 1 word changed. Ss often were unaware that the word had changed. Sometimes they reported seeing the 1st presented word, sometimes the 2nd presented word, and sometimes both. When only 1 word was reported, 2 factors were found to determine which one it was: the length of time a word was present during the fixation and the predi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(35 reference statements)
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to test this, some neutral comparison is needed. The best available comparison is the pattern observed in Blanchard, et al (1984). Consistent with this new prediction, the word present first in the fixations was reported more often than the second, unlike Blanchard, et al's (1984) pattern, in which the probability of reporting the first or second word was nearly equal.…”
Section: [Insert Figure 4 About Here]supporting
confidence: 61%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, to test this, some neutral comparison is needed. The best available comparison is the pattern observed in Blanchard, et al (1984). Consistent with this new prediction, the word present first in the fixations was reported more often than the second, unlike Blanchard, et al's (1984) pattern, in which the probability of reporting the first or second word was nearly equal.…”
Section: [Insert Figure 4 About Here]supporting
confidence: 61%
“…Consistent with this new prediction, the word present first in the fixations was reported more often than the second, unlike Blanchard, et al's (1984) pattern, in which the probability of reporting the first or second word was nearly equal. Table 2 presents the percentage of single word reports which were reports of the first and second words in this experiment and in Blanchard, et al (1984). Only the current experiment shows a significant difference by a chi-square test on the frequencies for first and second word reported (X(1,N = 16) = 17.63, p < .001).…”
Section: [Insert Figure 4 About Here]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations