During fixations, visual information, at some point, is passed on to higher-level processors, such that the reader's comprehension of the text is furthered by the information. This is referred to as the time of utilization. Previous research showed that the time of utilization varies, sometimes early, sometimes late, in the fixation. This experiment tested the hypothesis that the time of utilization is sometimes delayed because concurrent comprehension processes are still occupied with analyzing previous information (the variable utilization time hypothesis). The method of determining the time of utilization used in previous experiments (Blanchard, McConkie, Zola, & Wolverton, 1984) was combined with a manipulation of comprehension difficulty. The comprehension manipulation involved varying the distance between a pronoun and its referent, which Ehrlich and Rayner (1983) had shown to cause delayed processing effects. The desired effects were not obtained in this experiment; thus, the variable utilization time hypothesis could not be properly tested. Reasons for the failure to replicate Ehrlich and Rayner's (1983) effects are investigated. Also, some unpredicted results which support the variable utilization time hypothesis are discussed.