1991
DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199107000-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time Course of Satisfaction of Search

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the figures in those reports (Figures 5 and 6 in reference 1; and Figures 1, 2 and 3 in reference 2) all suggest rather obvious shifts particularly in the most lenient decision thresholds. Subsequent studies (17) did report some analyses of individual response frequencies and probabilities, but did not touch on the question of thresholds shifts. Although analysis of decision thresholds was briefly introduced to the radiology audience (15), it has never received much attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the figures in those reports (Figures 5 and 6 in reference 1; and Figures 1, 2 and 3 in reference 2) all suggest rather obvious shifts particularly in the most lenient decision thresholds. Subsequent studies (17) did report some analyses of individual response frequencies and probabilities, but did not touch on the question of thresholds shifts. Although analysis of decision thresholds was briefly introduced to the radiology audience (15), it has never received much attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decreases in ROC accuracy result from decreases in TP probability without changes in FP probability for each ROC point. Type I SOS is not generally related to changes in search behavior or inspection time (17). Type II SOS effects are based on reductions in visual search.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, a resource depletion account (e.g., Berbaum et al, 1991; suggests that cognitive resources (e.g., attention, working memory) are consumed by a found target and leave fewer resources available to detect additional targets during subsequent search. Finally, a perceptual set account suggests that searchers become biased to look for additional targets similar to the first found target (Berbaum et al, 1990;Berbaum et al, 1991;Berbaum et al, 2010); for example, if you just found a tumor, you might enter "tumor mode" and be less likely to subsequently detect a fracture that appeared in the same x-ray image.…”
Section: Example 2: Multiple-target Search Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in a 1991 study Berbaum et al studied the time course of SOS using the same chest image with native abnormalities and added nodule paradigm (27). They found that time to detect the nodules did not depend on the presence of native abnormalities (and vice versa), and total viewing times were the same for zero, one or two lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%