2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.04.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time course of lead induced proteomic changes in gill of the Antarctic limpet Nacella Concinna (Gastropoda: Patellidae)

Abstract: Proteomic analysis of gill tissue in Antarctic limpets exposed to different concentrations of lead (Pb) over a 168 h time period showed that proteomic changes vary with time. These changes included an increase in the demand of scavenging reactive oxygen species, acid-base balance and a challenge to protein homeostasis in the endoplasmic reticulum early on and subsequently an increase in energy metabolism, cellular signaling, and cytoskeletal modifications. Based on this time course, we hypothesize that the mai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine the protein alterations in response to heavy metal stress in polar yeast, a proteomic analysis by the method of 2‐DE and MALDI‐TOF/TOF MS was performed. To the best of our knowledge, proteomic analysis from the Antarctic organisms aimed at archaeon (Liao et al., ), bacteria (Kulkarni, Swamy, & Jagannadham, ), alga (Park, Jin, & Lee, ), and animals (Piechnik, Höckner, de Souza, Donatti, & Tomanek, ), and no study of proteome responses induced by heavy metal in Antarctic yeast was reported. Here, results of proteomics researches indicated that 51 DEPs were identified in Antarctic yeast R. mucilaginosa AN5, and they were classified into 6 categories by functional analysis, including carbohydrate and energy metabolism, nucleotide and amino acid metabolism, protein folding, antioxidant system, signaling, and unknown function proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To determine the protein alterations in response to heavy metal stress in polar yeast, a proteomic analysis by the method of 2‐DE and MALDI‐TOF/TOF MS was performed. To the best of our knowledge, proteomic analysis from the Antarctic organisms aimed at archaeon (Liao et al., ), bacteria (Kulkarni, Swamy, & Jagannadham, ), alga (Park, Jin, & Lee, ), and animals (Piechnik, Höckner, de Souza, Donatti, & Tomanek, ), and no study of proteome responses induced by heavy metal in Antarctic yeast was reported. Here, results of proteomics researches indicated that 51 DEPs were identified in Antarctic yeast R. mucilaginosa AN5, and they were classified into 6 categories by functional analysis, including carbohydrate and energy metabolism, nucleotide and amino acid metabolism, protein folding, antioxidant system, signaling, and unknown function proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the protein alterations in response to heavy metal stress in polar yeast, a proteomic analysis by the method of 2-DE and MALDI-TOF/TOF MS was performed. To the best of our knowledge, proteomic analysis from the Antarctic organisms aimed at archaeon (Liao et al, 2016), bacteria (Kulkarni, Swamy, & Jagannadham, 2015), alga (Park, Jin, & Lee, 2008), and animals (Piechnik, Höckner, de Souza, Donatti, & Tomanek, 2017), and no study of proteome responses induced by heavy metal in Antarctic yeast was reported.…”
Section: Ta B L E 1 (Continued)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several environmental proteomics reports indicating low amounts of proteins, possibly related to the biological complexity of the organisms or the proteome range methodologies available 83 , resulting in low correlations between RNA and protein levels. Many ecotoxicological reports refer to around 100 or less proteins identified in chitin based invertebrate species 86 89 but also in other invertebrates 90 , 91 . Despite the low correlation rates observed here, the information provided by these two levels of datasets revealed to be complementary and corroborative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%