Time course of inhibition of return in a spatial cueing paradigm with distractors

Eng, Vivian; Lim, Alfred; Janssen, Steve M. J.; Satel, J

doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.12.011

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This effect has been extensively studied in the two-dimensional (2D) plane, as in the early characterization of the IOR effect, the reasons for the IOR effect, and the neural basis of the IOR effect (Dodd et al., 2003; Eng et al., 2018; Hilchey et al., 2014; Klein, 2000; Martín-Arévalo et al., 2013; Maylor & Hockey, 1985; Posner & Cohen, 1984; Taylor & Klein, 2000). However, we live in a Three-dimensional (3D) space and use binocular and monocular cues, and the human brain can reconstruct a 3D space from 2D retinal images.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spatial Inhibition of Return Affected by Self-Prioritization Effect in Three-Dimensional Space

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Spatial inhibition of return (IOR) being affected by the self-prioritization effect (SPE) in a two-dimensional plane has been well documented. However, it remains unknown how the spatial IOR interacts with the SPE in three-dimensional (3D) space. By constructing a virtual 3D environment, Posner’s classically two-dimensional cue-target paradigm was applied to a 3D space. Participants first associated labels for themselves, their best friends, and strangers with geometric shapes in a shape-label matching task, then performed Experiment 1 (referential information appeared as the cue label) and Experiment 2 (referential information appeared as the target label) to investigate whether the IOR effect could be influenced by the SPE in 3D space. This study showed that when the cue was temporarily established with a self-referential shape and appeared in far space, the IOR effect was the smallest. When the target was temporarily established with a self-referential shape and appeared in near space, the IOR effect disappeared. This study suggests that the IOR effect was affected by the SPE when attention was oriented or reoriented in 3D space and that the IOR effect disappeared or decreased when affected by the SPE in 3D space.

show abstract