2011
DOI: 10.3858/emm.2011.43.7.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-course analysis of DNA damage response-related genes afterin vitroradiation in H460 and H1229 lung cancer cell lines

Abstract: Radiation is the most useful treatment modality for cancer patients. It initiates a series of signal cascades such as DNA damage response (DDR) signaling for repairing damaged DNA, arresting the cell cycle, and inducing cell death. Until now, few genes have been found to be regulated by radiation, which explains the molecular mechanisms of cellular responses to radiation. Although the transcriptional changes caused by radiation have been widely investigated, little is known about the direct evidence for the tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(30 reference statements)
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nearly all of the targets with patterns of expression that deviated from this trend ( Bax, Puma, Mdm2 , and others) were genes involved in the DNA damage response (Supplementary Fig. 4B), which was consistent with expected patterns of rapid transcriptional upregulation of this machinery at 24–72 hours after RT [1718]. Changes in gene expression for these markers peaked at the earliest measured time point, collected 2.5 days (60 hours) following RT.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Nearly all of the targets with patterns of expression that deviated from this trend ( Bax, Puma, Mdm2 , and others) were genes involved in the DNA damage response (Supplementary Fig. 4B), which was consistent with expected patterns of rapid transcriptional upregulation of this machinery at 24–72 hours after RT [1718]. Changes in gene expression for these markers peaked at the earliest measured time point, collected 2.5 days (60 hours) following RT.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The ATM pathway signature was tested using GSE20549 and ATM pathway activation increased in H1299 cells and transiently decreased and then restored in H460 cells (Supplemental Figure 2A). The pattern of ATM pathway activation is mirrored by the expression levels of MRE11A, ATM, ATR, p53BP1, CHK2, TOPBP1, CDC7, Claspin and CDC25C measured by Kim et al (37) demonstrating our genomic ATM profile accurately predicts ATM activity in this study. The GPX1 pathway signature was tested using GSE23895 and GPX1 pathway activation, as measured by the genomic profile for GPX1, decreased in the liver of rats fed selenium deficient diets and was highly correlated with GPX1 activity measured in the liver (Supplemental Figure 2 B) (38)).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Previous studies in mouse whole embryo and fetal brain tissue [5, 28-32] using a single time point microarray approach yielded a set of genes (and micro-RNAs) with diverse biological functions differentially expressed in ethanol-treated animals. The time series microarray approach is becoming an increasingly popular method for gene expression studies, particularly during development [33], tissue regeneration [34], in response to environmental stressors [35], in applications for which independent sampling schemes are used [36] and when sample numbers are limited [37, 38]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%