2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40614-022-00349-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time Cost and Demand: Implications for Public Policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historic discounting work examines choice when delay is the primary limiting factor and is hypothesized to overlap with time-cost demand , conceptually and operationally. As found in discounting experiments (e.g., Jones & Rachlin, 2006;Killeen, 2015) and noted by Schwartz and Hursh (2022), a power transformation on time improves model fits of data (see Figures 2 and 3). Such an approach would have shifted the values for P max (via a shift in curve-predicted values across the range of assessed temporal prices) but would not have altered the broader conclusions of this analysis (insofar as said shift in prediction is consistent across conditions).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Historic discounting work examines choice when delay is the primary limiting factor and is hypothesized to overlap with time-cost demand , conceptually and operationally. As found in discounting experiments (e.g., Jones & Rachlin, 2006;Killeen, 2015) and noted by Schwartz and Hursh (2022), a power transformation on time improves model fits of data (see Figures 2 and 3). Such an approach would have shifted the values for P max (via a shift in curve-predicted values across the range of assessed temporal prices) but would not have altered the broader conclusions of this analysis (insofar as said shift in prediction is consistent across conditions).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Behavioral-economic interpretations of complex choice offer insight that is otherwise difficult to discern (Critchfield & Reed, 2009) and may interest policy makers at varying scales Roma et al, 2017). Indeed, Schwartz and Hursh (2022) call for operant-demand analyses of time cost to inform prospective transportation policy. This study is among the first extension of cross-price demand modeling to examine the effects of time on choice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In behavioral-economic demand analyses, the costs and benefits are typically operationalized in terms of effort (e.g., FR price) and reinforcers consumed, respectively. Price changes also yield concomitant changes in the delay to the reinforcer, however, so it is possible to view the costs in terms of the time between reinforcers (i.e., the interreinforcement interval) in addition to the effort per reinforcer (Schwartz and Hursh, 2022). Indeed, orderly demand functions have been reported with time rather than effort as a constraint on consumption (Bauman, 1991;Tsunematsu, 2001), and there is good reason to suspect that the time between successive social reinforcers would also yield orderly social demand functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%