2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time Cells in the Hippocampus Are Neither Dependent on Medial Entorhinal Cortex Inputs nor Necessary for Spatial Working Memory

Abstract: Highlights d Neuron loss in the mEC results in an impairment in the delayed alternation task d Hippocampal sequential cell activity during delay intervals is not required for WM d CA1 spatial discrimination during WM encoding is disrupted by mEC lesions d CA3 cells distinguish contexts despite the loss of mEC inputs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
77
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(122 reference statements)
6
77
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of spiking parameters (spike amplitude and ISI during bursts) and spatial firing parameters (information content, spatial coherence, field size) were altered whereas others (spike peak-to-trough duration, infield mean firing rates, peak firing rate) were unaffected. These effects are similar to those reported in previous studies ( Brun et al, 2008 ; Hales et al, 2014 ; Kanter et al, 2017 ; Sabariego et al, 2019 ; Schlesiger et al, 2018 ) indicating that place cell firing does not exclusively depend on MEC inputs. Overdispersion, a parameter that reflects the excess variance inherent to place cell discharge ( Fenton and Muller, 1998 ) was found to be higher in MEC rats.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A number of spiking parameters (spike amplitude and ISI during bursts) and spatial firing parameters (information content, spatial coherence, field size) were altered whereas others (spike peak-to-trough duration, infield mean firing rates, peak firing rate) were unaffected. These effects are similar to those reported in previous studies ( Brun et al, 2008 ; Hales et al, 2014 ; Kanter et al, 2017 ; Sabariego et al, 2019 ; Schlesiger et al, 2018 ) indicating that place cell firing does not exclusively depend on MEC inputs. Overdispersion, a parameter that reflects the excess variance inherent to place cell discharge ( Fenton and Muller, 1998 ) was found to be higher in MEC rats.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…One recent study did not find evidence for time cell sequences during a 60s-delay (Sabariego et al, 2019). In our task, one lap of the route took approximately 4.5 minutes on average; comparable to the 250s-duration of a trial in Tsao et al (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Time cell ensembles change over minutes and days (Mau et al, 2018), but their firing has been investigated predominantly in the context of short delays in the range of seconds. One recent study did not find evidence for time cell sequences during a 60s-delay (Sabariego et al, 2019). In our task, one lap of the route took approximately 4.5 min on average; comparable to the 250s-duration of a trial in Tsao et al (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%