2009 International Conference on Computing, Engineering and Information 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2009.70
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time Based Predictive Maintenance Management of UK Rail Track

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Faiz and Singh [56] provide a good summary of track geometry faults and suggest that it would be beneficial to move from a maintenance regime based on reacting to faults to a predictive maintenance scheme, but the details of how this should be done are missing. Currently, UGMS make a lot of measurements, but do not do well at the predictive part, that is, predicting how assets will degrade in the future.…”
Section: Monitoring Changes Over Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faiz and Singh [56] provide a good summary of track geometry faults and suggest that it would be beneficial to move from a maintenance regime based on reacting to faults to a predictive maintenance scheme, but the details of how this should be done are missing. Currently, UGMS make a lot of measurements, but do not do well at the predictive part, that is, predicting how assets will degrade in the future.…”
Section: Monitoring Changes Over Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, this same permanent way has a position in the space, called track geometry, which is the spatial position of the rail track. According to Faiz and Singh (2009), the "X-axis" of the track represents the distance along the direction of travel, "Y" is the axis parallel to the running top rail (surface), and "Z" defines the axis perpendicular to the running permanent way. Each rail has 2 degrees of freedom, and these 4 degrees of freedom are normally replaced by an equivalent system consisting of cant, level, alignment, gauge, and twist (Esveld, 2001), which represent track geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, according to Vale and Ribeiro (2014) the second group of measurable parameters, namely geometry degradation is random by nature. The geometry of the permanent way is the position of the railway track in three-dimensional space (Faiz and Singh, 2009). According to Vale and Ribeiro (2014), track degradation is the decrease in quality of geometrical parameters (i.e., longitudinal and transversal level, gauge, twist, and cant) over a period of time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This failed or fault equipment can be replaced or restored to an operational condition within the limits established for in-service operations [5,6]. Predictive maintenance techniques are commonly designed in order to determine and predict the condition of failures and detailed forecast is ensured and this approach helps the companies in saving cost [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%