2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12108-021-09516-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time as Vernacular Resource: Temporality and Credibility in Social Problems Claims-Making

Abstract: Written for Dorothy Pawluch's festschrift for The American Sociologist, this paper seeks to advance constructionist conceptualization and theorizing of time. Our goal is to contribute to expanding the social constructionist toolkit by considering the role of temporality in social problems claims-making, i.e., temporal hermeneutics or time as a vernacular resource. We background this focus with a brief overview of sociological examinations of time, with a particular focus on the writings of George Herbert Mead,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theoretical and methodological assumptions that shaped this approach help explain the most enduring critique of the constructionist approach—that it favors claims promoted by elites who are covered in elite media and receive the attention of national officials (Adorjan 2019; Adorjan and Kelly 2022; Collins 1989; Miller 1993; Woolgar 2022). Even when they study social movements of claimsmakers who viewed themselves as challenging elite privilege, constructionists tend to concentrate on the most visible, prominent, and ultimately powerful activists and SMOs.…”
Section: Constructionism: Its Methods and Its Criticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical and methodological assumptions that shaped this approach help explain the most enduring critique of the constructionist approach—that it favors claims promoted by elites who are covered in elite media and receive the attention of national officials (Adorjan 2019; Adorjan and Kelly 2022; Collins 1989; Miller 1993; Woolgar 2022). Even when they study social movements of claimsmakers who viewed themselves as challenging elite privilege, constructionists tend to concentrate on the most visible, prominent, and ultimately powerful activists and SMOs.…”
Section: Constructionism: Its Methods and Its Criticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sociological methods require serious re-thinking, and there is a pressing need for developing new methods or adapting those already developed in other disciplines. Otherwise, sociology would remain stuck with a twentieth-century tool-set and risk sliding towards irrelevance and obscurity (Adorjan & Kelly 2021;Baranowski & Mroczkowska 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%