1996
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195637984.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time as a Metaphor of History: Early India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 The co-existence of IE tribes and DR castes indicates a complex historical interaction and suggests no 'one to one correlation' between language and this social organization. 12 In spite of the consensus on the relatively uniform maternal gene pool of Indian populations and the large efforts through many philological, 13,14 archaeological 15,16 and recent molecular genetic approaches to elucidate rival models, 6,7,9,11,12,[17][18][19][20][21] the history and concepts of the origin of the caste system are still controversial and unclear. The competing main models (the first of them based on shared IE languages) suggest that contemporary Hindu Indians are descendants of primarily West Eurasians who migrated from the Near east, Antolia and the Caucasus 3000-8000 years ago, 13,14 which has been supported by the demic diffusion model 1,22 and validated by molecular genetic data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 The co-existence of IE tribes and DR castes indicates a complex historical interaction and suggests no 'one to one correlation' between language and this social organization. 12 In spite of the consensus on the relatively uniform maternal gene pool of Indian populations and the large efforts through many philological, 13,14 archaeological 15,16 and recent molecular genetic approaches to elucidate rival models, 6,7,9,11,12,[17][18][19][20][21] the history and concepts of the origin of the caste system are still controversial and unclear. The competing main models (the first of them based on shared IE languages) suggest that contemporary Hindu Indians are descendants of primarily West Eurasians who migrated from the Near east, Antolia and the Caucasus 3000-8000 years ago, 13,14 which has been supported by the demic diffusion model 1,22 and validated by molecular genetic data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normally ␤-thalassemia trait in India is 3.3% with 1-2 per 1,000 couples being at risk of having an affected offspring each year, leading to a high societal burden [2]. As the ethnic composition of the Indian popu-lation is heterogeneous [3], each region of the country has its own distinct set and frequency of ␤-thalassemia mutations [4]. Orkin et al (5, Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Romila Thapar has argued for the Deorala case, 112 the Barh sati differed from other contemporaneous instances of sati not because of the specifics of its performance, but because of the attempt by certain sections of the community to justify it at a specific historical juncture. Dominant social and political concerns coalesced to make the events surrounding this immolation and its prosecution particularly relevant, as the immolation became a site on which a revivalist-nationalist defence of Hindu identity intersected with the criminal jurisdiction of the colonial state.…”
Section: The Aftermathmentioning
confidence: 99%