Abstract:1523 RESEARCH C old acclimation, or cold-hardening, occurs in many plant species in response to a period of low, above-freezing temperatures and short daylengths, as occur in the autumn in temperate regions of the world. Cold acclimation is associated with a plethora of metabolic changes that are thought to contribute to the ability to withstand subsequent freezing to potentially damaging tempera-). Specifically with wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), Herman et al. (2006) found that plants that had been cold-acclim… Show more
“…Both populations experience temperatures that trigger cold acclimation. The range of conditions over which cold acclimation is induced is poorly known and is likely to vary across taxa, but 4°C has been shown to induce cold acclimation in Arabidopsis thaliana (Alonso‐Blanco et al., ; Hannah et al., ; Zhen and Ungerer, ) and winter wheat (Zhu et al., ; Skinner, ). In winter at the SW site, soil temperatures are usually below freezing for more than 80 days, and temperatures can reach as low as −11°C, with air temperatures even colder (Oakley et al., ).…”
Premise
Despite myriad examples of local adaptation, the phenotypes and genetic variants underlying such adaptive differentiation are seldom known. Recent work on freezing tolerance and local adaptation in ecotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana from Italy and Sweden provides an essential foundation for uncovering the genotype–phenotype–fitness map for an adaptive response to a key environmental stress.
Methods
We examined the consequences of a naturally occurring loss‐of‐function (LOF) mutation in an Italian allele of the gene that encodes the transcription factor CBF2, which underlies a major freezing‐tolerance locus. We used four lines with a Swedish genetic background, each containing a LOF CBF2 allele. Two lines had introgression segments containing the Italian CBF2 allele, and two contained deletions created using CRISPR‐Cas9. We used a growth chamber experiment to quantify freezing tolerance and gene expression before and after cold acclimation.
Results
Freezing tolerance was lower in the Italian (11%) compared to the Swedish (72%) ecotype, and all four experimental CBF2 LOF lines had reduced freezing tolerance compared to the Swedish ecotype. Differential expression analyses identified 10 genes for which all CBF2 LOF lines, and the IT ecotype had similar patterns of reduced cold responsive expression compared to the SW ecotype.
Conclusions
We identified 10 genes that are at least partially regulated by CBF2 that may contribute to the differences in cold‐acclimated freezing tolerance between the Italian and Swedish ecotypes. These results provide novel insight into the molecular and physiological mechanisms connecting a naturally occurring sequence polymorphism to an adaptive response to freezing conditions.
“…Both populations experience temperatures that trigger cold acclimation. The range of conditions over which cold acclimation is induced is poorly known and is likely to vary across taxa, but 4°C has been shown to induce cold acclimation in Arabidopsis thaliana (Alonso‐Blanco et al., ; Hannah et al., ; Zhen and Ungerer, ) and winter wheat (Zhu et al., ; Skinner, ). In winter at the SW site, soil temperatures are usually below freezing for more than 80 days, and temperatures can reach as low as −11°C, with air temperatures even colder (Oakley et al., ).…”
Premise
Despite myriad examples of local adaptation, the phenotypes and genetic variants underlying such adaptive differentiation are seldom known. Recent work on freezing tolerance and local adaptation in ecotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana from Italy and Sweden provides an essential foundation for uncovering the genotype–phenotype–fitness map for an adaptive response to a key environmental stress.
Methods
We examined the consequences of a naturally occurring loss‐of‐function (LOF) mutation in an Italian allele of the gene that encodes the transcription factor CBF2, which underlies a major freezing‐tolerance locus. We used four lines with a Swedish genetic background, each containing a LOF CBF2 allele. Two lines had introgression segments containing the Italian CBF2 allele, and two contained deletions created using CRISPR‐Cas9. We used a growth chamber experiment to quantify freezing tolerance and gene expression before and after cold acclimation.
Results
Freezing tolerance was lower in the Italian (11%) compared to the Swedish (72%) ecotype, and all four experimental CBF2 LOF lines had reduced freezing tolerance compared to the Swedish ecotype. Differential expression analyses identified 10 genes for which all CBF2 LOF lines, and the IT ecotype had similar patterns of reduced cold responsive expression compared to the SW ecotype.
Conclusions
We identified 10 genes that are at least partially regulated by CBF2 that may contribute to the differences in cold‐acclimated freezing tolerance between the Italian and Swedish ecotypes. These results provide novel insight into the molecular and physiological mechanisms connecting a naturally occurring sequence polymorphism to an adaptive response to freezing conditions.
“…While some degree of cold hardening happens at temperatures as high as 10–12°C, for wheat and for other cold‐hardy perennial grasses (e.g., Gay and Eagles, 1991), complete acclimation does not occur until temperatures are well below this induction threshold and typically well below 5°C (Fowler, 2008; Ganeshan et al, 2009). In fact, further cold adaptation requires temperatures well below freezing (Herman et al, 2006; Veisz et al, 1996); individual freezing events even after acclimation have been achieved are associated with further short‐term transcriptional responses (Skinner, 2009); and maximal cold adaptation may require temperatures as low as −10°C (Skinner, 2014; Skinner and Bellinger, 2017). Photoperiod also has a role in achieving or prolonging cold tolerance in some wheat cultivars (Mahfoozi et al, 2001) but not in others (Limin and Fowler, 2006), and in general appears to be much less important than temperature in inducing cold tolerance.…”
PREMISE
Nucleic acid integrity can be compromised under many abiotic stresses. To date, however, few studies have considered whether nucleic acid damage and damage repair play a role in cold‐stress adaptation. A further insufficiently explored question concerns how age affects cold stress adaptation among mature perennials. As a plant ages, the optimal trade‐off between growth and stress tolerance may shift.
METHODS
Oxidative damage to RNA and expression of genes involved in DNA repair were compared in multiple mature cohorts of Thinopyrum intermedium (an emerging perennial cereal) and in wheat and barley under intermittent freezing stress and under nonfreezing conditions. Activity of glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and four other antioxidative enzymes was also measured under these conditions. DNA repair genes included photolyases involved in repairing ultraviolet‐induced damage and two genes involved in repairing oxidatively induced damage (ERCC1, RAD23).
RESULTS
Freezing stress was accompanied by large increases in photolyase expression and ERCC1 expression (in wheat and Thinopyrum) and in GPX and GR activity (particularly in Thinopyrum). This is the first report of DNA photolyases being overexpressed under freezing stress. Older Thinopyrum had lower photolyase expression and less freezing‐induced overexpression of ERCC1. Younger Thinopyrum plants sustained more oxidative damage to RNA.
CONCLUSIONS
Overexpression of DNA repair genes is an important aspect of cold acclimation. When comparing adult cohorts, aging was associated with changes in the freezing stress response, but not with overall increases or decreases in stress tolerance.
“…Prior to the hard freeze, we decreased the temperatures to −2 ˚C and added ice chips to the plants to facilitate ice nucleation (Case et al, 2014). The plants were subjected to a period of freezing of −8 ˚C for 24 h. During the freezing period, plants were kept in the dark following other studies to avoid potential confounding effects of temperature and Circadian rhythm (Case et al, 2014;Skinner, 2014;Skinner & Bellinger, 2017). To simulate a freeze-thaw cycle, we then raised the chamber temperature to 4 ˚C for 2 d with 50 PAR with a 4-h photoperiod.…”
Section: Freezing Tolerance Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then repeated the process of ramping down the temperature and ice chipping and then subjected the plants to another period at −8 ˚C, this time for 48 h. These exposure times and temperatures in this experiment were chosen from among preliminary trials (results not shown) as those that produced the largest relative differences in freezing tolerance between the control line Norstar and select southern accessions. While other studies have assayed freezing tolerance in winter wheat at colder temperatures, typically for shorter durations (Case et al, 2014;Skinner, 2014;Skinner & Bellinger, 2017;Skinner & Garland-Campbell, 2008), here we investigate the effect of slightly warmer temperatures sustained over a longer duration.…”
Section: Freezing Tolerance Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most temperate herbaceous plants, freezing tolerance requires a period of exposure to low but nonfreezing temperatures (Preston & Sandve, 2013). During this process, termed cold acclimation (Sarhadi et al, 2010;Skinner, 2014;Skinner & Bellinger, 2017), dramatic transcriptional changes, lead to physiological and biochemical changes that enhance tolerance (Case et al, 2014). For instance, proteins and protective substances like soluble sugars and proline are synthetized (Ding et al, 2019).…”
Freezing tolerance is likely to be an important adaptation for both natural populations and crop cultivars like winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). In the United States, winter wheat represents 80% of the total wheat production. Understanding the genetic basis of freezing tolerance in wheat furthers our knowledge of abiotic stress tolerance in plants and may inform breeding programs aimed at adjusting the level of freezing tolerance for a given region. We examined freezing tolerance in a 267-line panel of elite soft red winter wheat that has previously been used for genome-wide association study (GWAS) on agronomically important traits. We were specifically interested in determining the extent of genetic variation for freezing tolerance within the panel, what the genetic basis of that variation is, and if there are correlations between freezing tolerance and other agronomically important traits. We found significant variation in freezing tolerance among the lines, measured as survival through three total days at −8 ˚C. We performed a GWAS on freezing tolerance and identified 13 candidate loci, with nearby candidate genes involved in different functions potentially associated with freezing tolerance. In addition, we found significant correlations between freezing tolerance and seven previously published yield related traits. In summary, we found considerable variation in freezing tolerance in this panel that is associated with yield related traits. Thus, these lines may be useful for breeding programs seeking to optimize freezing tolerance for present and future climatic conditions.
INTRODUCTIONWheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the most important crops worldwide. It is cultivated in ∼200 million ha (http: //www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC/visualize) (Zhao et al., 2013) and provided about 20% of all dietary calories consumed globally (
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.