The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2011.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Time-adaptive quantile-copula for wind power probabilistic forecasting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
87
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is clearly a quite significant negative deviation (corresponding to an over-forecast) for both methods, with QR having the largest deviation. 19 We provide a more detailed comparison of different probabilistic WPF methods in [93], [94], and [95]. The results indicate that KDF forecasts outperform QR in terms of calibration, whereas QR tends to perform better in terms of sharpness, which is a measure of the width of the forecast distribution.…”
Section: Probabilistic Wind Power Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There is clearly a quite significant negative deviation (corresponding to an over-forecast) for both methods, with QR having the largest deviation. 19 We provide a more detailed comparison of different probabilistic WPF methods in [93], [94], and [95]. The results indicate that KDF forecasts outperform QR in terms of calibration, whereas QR tends to perform better in terms of sharpness, which is a measure of the width of the forecast distribution.…”
Section: Probabilistic Wind Power Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the project, we have developed novel statistical uncertainty forecasting approaches using kernel density forecasts (KDFs). Two new KDF-based WPF methods based on the Nadaraya-Watson (NW) and Quantile-Copula (QC) estimators are proposed in [93], [94], and [95].…”
Section: Probabilistic Wind Power Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations