2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0092.2011.00377.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Timber Monuments, Landscape Andthe Environment in the Nith Valley, Dumfries and Galloway

Abstract: Summary This paper considers the impact of landscape and environment upon monuments built during the Neolithic period. Taking a group of timber monuments of Neolithic date in the Nith Valley region, Dumfries and Galloway, it examines their relationship to the topography and environment and seeks to explain their uniquely linear nature, a feature of timber monuments built in this region. It discusses the importance of incorporating plough‐levelled sites into landscape approaches to monuments, the potential impa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, cropmark sites and the landscapes identified on aerial photographs have tended to play only relatively minor roles in the approaches employed by phenomenologically-inclined archaeologists, most focusing instead upon surviving monuments in the uplands (e.g. Tilley 1996;Cummings et al 2002;Fraser2004;Cummings and Pannett 2005), although there are some notable exceptions (Tilley 1994;Brophy 1999;Poller 2005;Hamilton et al 2006;Millican 2009;2012).This imbalance is further emphasised by the contexts within which cropmark sites are most often recorded and studied; as elements of programmes of reconnaissance by organisations such as…”
Section: Between the Outside And The Inside: Aerial Archaeology And Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, cropmark sites and the landscapes identified on aerial photographs have tended to play only relatively minor roles in the approaches employed by phenomenologically-inclined archaeologists, most focusing instead upon surviving monuments in the uplands (e.g. Tilley 1996;Cummings et al 2002;Fraser2004;Cummings and Pannett 2005), although there are some notable exceptions (Tilley 1994;Brophy 1999;Poller 2005;Hamilton et al 2006;Millican 2009;2012).This imbalance is further emphasised by the contexts within which cropmark sites are most often recorded and studied; as elements of programmes of reconnaissance by organisations such as…”
Section: Between the Outside And The Inside: Aerial Archaeology And Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, despite the reservations, a number of experiential studies have been attempted at plough levelled sites (Tilley 1994;Brophy 1999;Poller 2005;Hamilton et al 2006;Millican 2009;2012). Those undertaken by Brophy (1999), Poller (2005)and Millican (2009;2012) employed much more positive views of cropmarks than those indicated by Tilley (1994) and Hamilton et al (2006). All demonstrate that experiential approaches are possible at plough-levelled sites and can enrich the way in which these sites and landscapes are understood.…”
Section: Rcahms (Royal Commission On the Ancient And Historical Monummentioning
confidence: 99%