1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1689(199712)7:4<229::aid-stvr149>3.0.co;2-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TIM—a test improvement model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Approach Abbreviation Ryu et al (2008) Ministry of National Defense-Testing Maturity Model MND-TMM Taipale and Smolander (2006) Observing practice - Meta-measurement approach - Jung (2009) Embedded Test Process Improvement Model Emb-TPI Rana and Ahmad (2005), Burnstein et al (1996), Tayamanon et al (2011), Burnstein (2003, Burnstein et al (1999), Jacobs et al (2000), Suwannasart (1996), Homyen (1998) Testing Maturity Model TMM Xu-Xiang and Wen-Ning (2010) Plan-Do-Check-Action (PDCA)-based software testing improvement framework - Jacobs and Trienekens (2002) Metrics Based Verification and Validation Maturity Model MB-VV-MM Kasoju et al (2013) Evidence-based Software Engineering - Kasurinen et al (2011) Self-Assessment framework for ISO/IEC 29119 based on TIM - Heiskanen et al (2012) Test Process Improvement Model for Automated Test Generation ATG add-on for TPI Reid (2012) Software Testing Standard ISO/IEC 29119, ISO/IEC 33603 - Ericson et al (1997) Test Improvement Model TIM Karlström et al (2005) Minimal test practice framework MTPF Koomen and Pol (1999), Koomen (2002) Test Process Improvement TPI TPI (2004) TPI ® Automotive TPI ® Automotive v. Ewijk et al (2013) TPI ® NEXT TPI ® NEXT Rasking (2011), van Veenendal (2008 Test Maturity Model integration TMMi ® Steiner et al (2012); Schweigert et al (2014) Test SPICE -…”
Section: Refmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approach Abbreviation Ryu et al (2008) Ministry of National Defense-Testing Maturity Model MND-TMM Taipale and Smolander (2006) Observing practice - Meta-measurement approach - Jung (2009) Embedded Test Process Improvement Model Emb-TPI Rana and Ahmad (2005), Burnstein et al (1996), Tayamanon et al (2011), Burnstein (2003, Burnstein et al (1999), Jacobs et al (2000), Suwannasart (1996), Homyen (1998) Testing Maturity Model TMM Xu-Xiang and Wen-Ning (2010) Plan-Do-Check-Action (PDCA)-based software testing improvement framework - Jacobs and Trienekens (2002) Metrics Based Verification and Validation Maturity Model MB-VV-MM Kasoju et al (2013) Evidence-based Software Engineering - Kasurinen et al (2011) Self-Assessment framework for ISO/IEC 29119 based on TIM - Heiskanen et al (2012) Test Process Improvement Model for Automated Test Generation ATG add-on for TPI Reid (2012) Software Testing Standard ISO/IEC 29119, ISO/IEC 33603 - Ericson et al (1997) Test Improvement Model TIM Karlström et al (2005) Minimal test practice framework MTPF Koomen and Pol (1999), Koomen (2002) Test Process Improvement TPI TPI (2004) TPI ® Automotive TPI ® Automotive v. Ewijk et al (2013) TPI ® NEXT TPI ® NEXT Rasking (2011), van Veenendal (2008 Test Maturity Model integration TMMi ® Steiner et al (2012); Schweigert et al (2014) Test SPICE -…”
Section: Refmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In "TIM -A Test Improvement Model" [16], Ericson et al dedicate one of the five key areas to testware. The key area is, apart from a requirement on configuration management, primarily concerned about what the testware does, such as automated result checking, and not as much about how to handle the testware.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TPI(Test Process Improvement) [5] was developed by Martin Poll and Tim Kooman in 1997. It is a maturity model that supports test process improvements.…”
Section: Tmm and Tpimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to solve this problem, many test process models, such as TMM [4], TIM [5], and TPI [6] models, have been developed. However, they have several limitations which make their applications to the test process improvements in a specific domain like a defense domain restrictive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%