2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00180-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tilt dependency of slant aftereffect

Abstract: Slant aftereffect (SAE), the negative aftereffect of slant induced after prolonged observation of a surface, is considered as evidence that slant is encoded in the visual system. Because slant and tilt are mathematically independent dimensions, Stevens (Stevens, K. A. (1983a). Biological Cybernetics, 46, 183-195) assumed that slant and tilt are processed independently in the visual system. To confirm this assumption, we investigated whether SAE is induced independently of the difference in tilt between the ada… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast the EXP solution can not be recovered in this way since it requires non-independent processing of slant and tilt. Consequently, unlike the EXP solution, use of a MAP solution is not consistent with the findings of Seyama et al (2000). In this study, the authors tested whether adapting to slanted surfaces depended on the tilt difference between the adapting and test surfaces.…”
Section: Map Vs Exp Decision Rulementioning
confidence: 96%
“…In contrast the EXP solution can not be recovered in this way since it requires non-independent processing of slant and tilt. Consequently, unlike the EXP solution, use of a MAP solution is not consistent with the findings of Seyama et al (2000). In this study, the authors tested whether adapting to slanted surfaces depended on the tilt difference between the adapting and test surfaces.…”
Section: Map Vs Exp Decision Rulementioning
confidence: 96%
“…This bipole grouping theory has a natural extension to grouping by cells that are sensitive to 3D surface orientation, which becomes an increasingly important cue when processing surfaces that are tilted or curved in 3D. Indeed, disparity gradient cells (DeAngelis, 2000; Hinkle and Connor, 2002;Janssen et al, 2000b;Lee, 1999;Nguyenkim and DeAngelis, 2003;Ryan and Gillam, 1993;Sakata et al, 1999;Seyama et al, 2000, Thomas et al, 2002 can form coherent groupings across depths. These types of cells have been used by Grossberg and Swaminathan (2004) to explain developmental, attentional and bistability data about 3D perception of slanted and curved surfaces and of 2D images.…”
Section: Comparison Of Lightshaft With Previous Sft Models and Neuropmentioning
confidence: 99%