2002
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2002.9060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tillage, Nitrogen, and Cropping System Effects on Soil Carbon Sequestration

Abstract: With increased cropping intensity, one would expect that more crop residue and C would be added to the Soil C sequestration can improve soil quality and reduce agriculsoil than with a crop-fallow system (Campbell et al., ture's contribution to CO 2 emissions. The long-term (12 yr) effects of tillage system and N fertilization on crop residue production and 1995, 2000b; Janzen et al., 1998a; Peterson et al., 1998). soil organic C (SOC) sequestration in two dryland cropping systems As the amount of crop residue … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
126
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 399 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
18
126
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In CT, intensive and shallow tillage leads to significant negative impact on soil health and quality parameter, whereas ZT facilitate buildup in soil organic matter, improve soil biological activity and soil structure due to maintenance of soil aggregates, and reduced oxidation of soil organic matter. These findings are in agreement with [69] and [70]. Results of the long-term research by [19] suggests that ZT significantly reduced bulk density and penetration resistance; increased organic carbon, saturated hydraulic conductivity, water stable aggregate, microbial biomass carbon and soil enzyme activities compared to CT. Additionally, ZT facilitates advance planting (ZT drills works well on relatively high soil moisture which is not the case for CT), regulates (buffers) soil as well as canopy temperature that helps in developing better root system (mass, density, length) which in turn results into better nutrient uptake and plant withstanding against high velocity winds at grain filling/maturity (reduce lodging) [71].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In CT, intensive and shallow tillage leads to significant negative impact on soil health and quality parameter, whereas ZT facilitate buildup in soil organic matter, improve soil biological activity and soil structure due to maintenance of soil aggregates, and reduced oxidation of soil organic matter. These findings are in agreement with [69] and [70]. Results of the long-term research by [19] suggests that ZT significantly reduced bulk density and penetration resistance; increased organic carbon, saturated hydraulic conductivity, water stable aggregate, microbial biomass carbon and soil enzyme activities compared to CT. Additionally, ZT facilitates advance planting (ZT drills works well on relatively high soil moisture which is not the case for CT), regulates (buffers) soil as well as canopy temperature that helps in developing better root system (mass, density, length) which in turn results into better nutrient uptake and plant withstanding against high velocity winds at grain filling/maturity (reduce lodging) [71].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Šimanský and Tobiašová (2012) showed that higher doses of NPK fertilisers are responsible for the higher mineralisation rate of soil organic matter. It is obvious that the fertilisers applied to the soil can act diametrically opposite; the effect of their action depends on their dose, which confirmed the findings of several authors (Halvorson et al 2002;Whalen & Chang 2002). The use of organic manure caused the fastest build up of the N in the soil, followed by crop residues (in our case grass biomass).…”
Section: T a B L Esupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Our values of C sequestration rates for dryland cropping systems were within the range reported by Halvorson et al [26]. Nitrogen fertilization has been known to increase soil C sequestration compared with no N fertilization [27].…”
Section: Soil Carbon Sequestrationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Halvorson et al [26] reported that no-till continuous cropping increased dryland soil C sequestration at 0 -15 cm by 854 kg CO 2 -C ha −1…”
Section: Soil Carbon Sequestrationmentioning
confidence: 99%