2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2018.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tillage intensity or landscape features: What matters most for wild bee diversity in vineyards?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
42
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Landscape structures like fallows (Toivonen, Herzon, & Kuussaari, ), hedges (Morandin & Kremen, ), solitary trees, or edges of woods (Nicholson et al, ; Rollin et al, ) provide different foraging sites for wild bees. Furthermore, these structures may compensate for negative effects of low to very low floral resource availability on eusocial wild bees that nest in the inter‐row space of vineyards (Kratschmer et al, ). Spanish vineyards possessed similar average floral resource availabilities as Austrian vineyards, which, according to our results, should benefit eusocial species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Landscape structures like fallows (Toivonen, Herzon, & Kuussaari, ), hedges (Morandin & Kremen, ), solitary trees, or edges of woods (Nicholson et al, ; Rollin et al, ) provide different foraging sites for wild bees. Furthermore, these structures may compensate for negative effects of low to very low floral resource availability on eusocial wild bees that nest in the inter‐row space of vineyards (Kratschmer et al, ). Spanish vineyards possessed similar average floral resource availabilities as Austrian vineyards, which, according to our results, should benefit eusocial species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intensity of this disturbance varies among wine-growing areas across Europe according to local pedological and climatic conditions. Wild bees in vineyards have been shown to benefit from biodiversity-friendly management practices and from mosaics of semi-natural elements within the viticultural landscape (Kehinde & Samways, 2014a, 2014bKratschmer et al, 2018). Further, species characterized by certain traits may respond similarly to a certain vegetation management measure or landscape configuration in wine-growing areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) is among the oldest perennial crops and well adapted to (summer-) dry climates. Vineyard inter-rows provide habitats for a range of plant and above-and belowground animal species, especially when covered with vegetation (Kehinde and Samways 2014;Kratschmer et al 2018). Organisms colonizing these inter-rows provide various ecosystem services (e.g., primary production, pest control, pollination, erosion mitigation and soil nutrient cycling), while their occurrence and abundance are influenced by a range of factors, including tillage practices (Faber et al 2017), weeds and cover crops, surrounding landscape structures and applications of agrochemicals for pest management (Sharley et al 2008;Thomson and Hoffmann 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could lead to an increased abundance of that species in the following year. This result has been underpinned by another wild bee study conducted in this winegrowing region, where the increasing proportion of woods positively affected the total wild bee abundance present in vineyards (Kratschmer et al ., ). It further corresponds to Leong et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For the urban region, the categories on landscape structures were already specified, because the data were extracted from the geodataviewer of the city of Vienna (Stadt Wien, ). For the vineyard region, data from the BiodivERsA project VineDivers (http://www.vinedivers.eu) were used, in which the landscape categories were defined before field mapping (see Kratschmer et al ., for a detailed method). Therefore it was possible to differentiate between ‘entomophilous crops’ (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%