2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tillage-induced changes in fungal and bacterial biomass associated with soil aggregates: A long-term field study in a subtropical rice soil in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
33
1
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
33
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This inferred that the interaction between NH 3 and nitrifying microorganisms associated with different aggregates was not altered by tillage. The distribution pattern of TOC, total N, and microbial biomass associated with aggregates had no significant differences between tillage regimes although TOC, TN, and microbial biomass were higher under RNT than CT (Jiang et al 2011a;Jiang et al 2011b). Wright et al (2005) also reported that the forms of tillage had no significant effects on the distribution of TOC in aggregates through 20 years long-term field experiment, and the distribution of microbial biomass in aggregates showed similar conclusions.…”
Section: Tillage Effects On Net Nitrification Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This inferred that the interaction between NH 3 and nitrifying microorganisms associated with different aggregates was not altered by tillage. The distribution pattern of TOC, total N, and microbial biomass associated with aggregates had no significant differences between tillage regimes although TOC, TN, and microbial biomass were higher under RNT than CT (Jiang et al 2011a;Jiang et al 2011b). Wright et al (2005) also reported that the forms of tillage had no significant effects on the distribution of TOC in aggregates through 20 years long-term field experiment, and the distribution of microbial biomass in aggregates showed similar conclusions.…”
Section: Tillage Effects On Net Nitrification Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Since the rate of O 2 diffusion is directly related to the distance (aggregate radius), O 2 concentrations are assumed different in various aggregate sizes (Sexstone et al 1985;Kremen et al 2005), and thus differentially affect the nitrification process (Craswell et al 1970). Thirdly, heterogeneous distribution of microbial biomass (Gupta and Germida 1988;Beauchamp and Seech 1990;Miller and Dick 1995;Franzluebbers and Arshad 1997;Jiang et al 2011b) and diversity (Lupwayi et al 2001) among aggregates also plays critical roles in nitrification processes associated with aggregates. Furthermore, most nitrifiers are attached to soil surfaces (Chenu et al 2001;Arp et al 2002), and this kind of attachment stimulates nitrification (Keen and Prosser 1987).…”
Section: Kinetics Of Net Nitrification and Net Mineralization Associamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This positive effect of forests on soil aggregate stability is probably due to the combined effects of no tillage, accumulation of leaf litter, and the powerful root systems of poplar. Tillage regimes have been reported to cause a decrease in the proportion of macroaggregates (X. Jiang et al, ) and somehow inhibit fungal growth (Van der Wal et al, ); this may have contributed to inducing higher fungi copy numbers in forest soils than in the other two managed agricultural soils. Besides, many members of Basidiomycota and Ascomycota are saprotrophic fungi, which are more able to degrade lignocellulose organic matter (Osono & Takeda, ; Yelle, Ralph, Lu, & Hammel, ), such as straw, litter, and wood (Van der Wal et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given our constraints on the DNA yield from the aggregate groups, and the knowledge that fungi are not uniquely associated with the enzyme assayed herein, b-glucosidase, we pyrosequenced only 16S rRNA genes, which does not capture fungal sequences. Assay of the fungal community would be informative, particularly in a study of aggregates of broader size ranges, as fungi and bacteria may preferentially dominate different size classes of aggregates, with bacterial biomass dominating in aggregates less than 2 mm, and fungal biomass predominantly associated with aggregates greater than 2 mm (Jiang et al, 2011). It has also been suggested experimentally that bacterial diversity is more significant than fungal diversity in the silt and clay particulate fractions (compared with coarse sands 4250 mm) (Poll et al, 2003), such as those that compose the macroaggregates in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%