Tillage based, site-specific weed control for conservation cropping systems

Walsh, Michael; Squires, Caleb C.; Coleman, Guy; Widderick, M.; McKiernan, Adam B.; Chauhan, Bhagirath Singh; Peressini, Carlo; Guzzomi, Andrew

doi:10.1017/wet.2020.34

Cited by 7 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 15 publications

(14 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Coupling the GPIO pins of the Raspberry Pi with a relay control board makes identifiable interactions between the camera input, image-based detection output and actuation. The use of the OWL for SSWC requires coupling with external actuators such as solenoids for spot spraying or targeted tillage 40 . The OWL platform combines simple assembly and software designs with practical fallow field detection outcomes.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

OpenWeedLocator (OWL): an open-source, low-cost device for fallow weed detection

Coleman

Salter

Walsh

2022

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of a fallow phase is an important tool for maximizing crop yield potential in moisture limited agricultural environments, with a focus on removing weeds to optimize fallow efficiency. Repeated whole field herbicide treatments to control low-density weed populations is expensive and wasteful. Site-specific herbicide applications to low-density fallow weed populations is currently facilitated by proprietary, sensor-based spray booms. The use of image analysis for fallow weed detection is an opportunity to develop a system with potential for in-crop weed recognition. Here we present OpenWeedLocator (OWL), an open-source, low-cost and image-based device for fallow weed detection that improves accessibility to this technology for the weed control community. A comprehensive GitHub repository was developed, promoting community engagement with site-specific weed control methods. Validation of OWL as a low-cost tool was achieved using four, existing colour-based algorithms over seven fallow fields in New South Wales, Australia. The four algorithms were similarly effective in detecting weeds with average precision of 79% and recall of 52%. In individual transects up to 92% precision and 74% recall indicate the performance potential of OWL in fallow fields. OWL represents an opportunity to redefine the approach to weed detection by enabling community-driven technology development in agriculture.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

OpenWeedLocator (OWL): an open-source, low-cost device for fallow weed detection

Coleman

Salter

Walsh

2022

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For physical weed control in tree crops, there is also potential to develop precision agricultural machinery. Site‐specific mechanical weeders or camera‐guided hoes might be adaptable to remove weeds between rows and/or in‐row, depending on the set‐up and cost‐effectiveness (Fernández‐Quintanilla et al, 2018; Walsh et al, 2020).…”

Section: Options For Reducing Glyphosate Use In Europementioning

confidence: 99%

Current and future glyphosate use in European agriculture

Neve,

Matzrafi,

Ulber

et al. 2024

Weed Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There has been a longstanding and contentious debate about the future of glyphosate use in the European Union (EU). In November 2023, the European Commission approved the renewal of the use registration for glyphosate for a further 10 years. Nevertheless, the EU Farm to Fork strategy calls for a 50% reduction in pesticide use by 2030. In November 2022, the European Weed Research Society organised a 2 day workshop to identify critical glyphosate uses in current EU cropping systems and to review the availability of glyphosate alternatives. Workshop participants identified four current, critical uses in EU cropping systems; control and management of perennial weeds, weed control in conservation agriculture, vegetation management in tree and vine crops and herbicide resistance management. There are few herbicide alternatives that provide effective, economic, broad‐spectrum control of weeds, particularly perennial weeds. Mechanical weed control, and in particular, soil cultivation is the most obvious glyphosate alternative. However, this is not possible in conservation agriculture systems and, in general, increased soil cultivation has negative impacts for soil health. Emerging technologies for precision weed control can enable more targeted use of glyphosate, greatly reducing use rates. These technologies also facilitate the use and development of alternative targeted physical weed control (e.g. tillage, lasers, electricity), reducing the energy and environmental costs of these approaches. In tree crops, the use of organic and inorganic mulches can reduce the need for glyphosate use. In general, reduced use of glyphosate will require an even greater focus on integrated weed management to reduce weed establishment in agroecosystems, increase weed management diversity and limit the use of alternative resistance‐prone herbicides.

show abstract

“…The evolved technology is now commercially available in an integrated version compatible with many combine harvester makes and models and is demonstrating weed control success internationally. The weed chipper is the first fallow mechanical weeder compatible with large-scale cropping systems (Walsh et al, 2020). The success of the weed chipper is attributed to collaboration with stakeholders in farming, research (agronomy and engineering), manufacturing and industry.…”

Section: Commercializationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Farmer-driven innovation: lessons from a case study of subterranean clover seed production

Moss

Nichols

Foster

et al. 2022

PROM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Farmers are often overlooked and undervalued as sources of innovation, but can be powerful drivers of ingenuity and development. We evaluate historical developments in the Australian subterranean clover seed-production industry as a case study of farmer-driven innovation. Subterranean clover seed machinery patents (75% of which were patented by farmers) are analysed using conventional innovation frameworks, such as the theory of inventive problem solving (TRIZ), to extract lessons for supporting farmer-driven innovation. The small scale of this industry, compared with mainstream cereal-cropping industries and the isolation of farmers, provides analogous lessons for agriculture in developing countries. Economic drivers are important in enabling farmer innovation and the value proposition for developing new inventions must be clear to justify the time and expense. Farmers are different from firms and their on-farm knowledge and experience can form an essential part of innovation. Drivers of innovation also differ, with farmers less likely to attempt to commercialize inventions. Farmers can also be hesitant to share their inventions, instead holding them as trade secrets in competitive industries. Support and collaboration are needed from government and researchers to assist in commercialization or dissemination of useful innovations and to prevent knowledge from being confined to a localized farmer or region. Advances in agriculture require farmer input in research and development, but the benefits will be greater if farmers are enabled to be drivers of innovation.

show abstract

Tillage based, site-specific weed control for conservation cropping systems

Cited by 7 publications

References 15 publications

OpenWeedLocator (OWL): an open-source, low-cost device for fallow weed detection

OpenWeedLocator (OWL): an open-source, low-cost device for fallow weed detection

Current and future glyphosate use in European agriculture

Farmer-driven innovation: lessons from a case study of subterranean clover seed production

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About