Cellular Automata 2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8700-9_552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tiling Problem and Undecidability in Cellular Automata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kari and Ollinger proved in [38] that the periodicity problem for one-dimensional cellular automata is undecidable. We refer to Kari [34,35,36,37] for more related results for cellular automata.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kari and Ollinger proved in [38] that the periodicity problem for one-dimensional cellular automata is undecidable. We refer to Kari [34,35,36,37] for more related results for cellular automata.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some of these settings, generalizations of Williams' decomposition theorem have been established [16,3], showing that conjugacies between shifts of finite type can be expressed as a sequence of splittings followed by amalgamations, suitably defined. Conjugacy of higher-dimensional SFTs has been shown to be undecidable (in fact, Σ 0 1 -complete) by Berger [5] who phrased the problem in terms of tilings (see Kari [19] for a general discussion of such problems), and recently Jeandel and Vanier [15] have shown that the simpler problem of determining conjugacy to any given fixed SFT is still undecidable (and Σ 0 1 -complete). The same authors also give the recursion-theoretic complexity of related problems, such as deciding factorization and embedding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%