2004
DOI: 10.1155/2004/792493
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tight wavelet frames in Lebesgue and Sobolev spaces

Abstract: Abstract. We study tight wavelet frame systems in Lp (R d ) and prove that such systems (under mild hypotheses) give atomic decompositions of Lp(R d ) for 1 < p < ∞. We also characterize Lp(R d ) and Sobolev space norms by the analysis coefficients for the frame. We consider Jackson inequalities for best mterm approximation with the systems in Lp(R d ) and prove that such inequalities exist. Moreover, it is proved that the approximation rate given by the Jackson inequality can be realized by thresholding the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are more than one function whose quasi-interpolations are P q −1 S and P 0 S given as (2.4) and (2.5), we never get the underlying function S. One can only expect to obtain a better approximation P 0 S of S from P q −1 S. The approximation 123 power of P 0 S and P q −1 S and their difference can be established for smooth functions by applying the corresponding results in [19] which depend on the properties of the underlying refinable function; more general for piecewise smooth functions, it can be studied by applying results and ideas from [3] and [4] which depend on the properties of the framelets. We omit the detailed discussion here.…”
Section: Formulation In Mramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are more than one function whose quasi-interpolations are P q −1 S and P 0 S given as (2.4) and (2.5), we never get the underlying function S. One can only expect to obtain a better approximation P 0 S of S from P q −1 S. The approximation 123 power of P 0 S and P q −1 S and their difference can be established for smooth functions by applying the corresponding results in [19] which depend on the properties of the underlying refinable function; more general for piecewise smooth functions, it can be studied by applying results and ideas from [3] and [4] which depend on the properties of the framelets. We omit the detailed discussion here.…”
Section: Formulation In Mramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, similar to the approaches in [10,11,12,17,24], we only require the underlying solution f to have a sparse representation under the tight frame system we constructed. It is shown in [7,8] that piecewise smooth functions with a few spikes do have sparse representations by compactly supported tight frame systems. Hence, implicitly, we assume that f is piecewise smooth with possibly some spikes.…”
Section: S = F (X Y) + η(X Y T)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to state our result on dual Riesz wavelet bases in Sobolev spaces, let us introduce a notion µ 2 (â), which is similar and closely related to the quantity ν 2 (â) in (1.18) ( [34,35]). For a 2π-periodic functionâ, we define µ 2 (â) to be the supremum of all ν 2 …”
Section: \{0}mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that this system cannot form a frame in L 2 (R ) is equivalent to its Sobolev norm (see e.g. [2,3,16,17,26,41]). This approach in the literature requires that wavelet systems have positive regularity and vanishing moments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%