SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2011 2011
DOI: 10.1190/1.3627654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tight shale elastic properties using the soft‐porosity and single aspect ratio models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stiff pores could remain open at very high pressures, in agreement with Christensen (1974) who has shown that small amounts of high aspect ratio cracks may be preserved in rocks, even at pressures as high as 1 GPa. Ruiz & Azizov (2011) demonstrated, that the dependence of elastic wave velocities on depth (and on pressure) could be described with the same quality by considering a single set of pores with a depth-dependent aspect ratio. When anisotropic materials are considered, it is natural to expect that cracks with different aspect ratios may have different orientation distributions, and these orientation distributions do change with pressure as cracks close within the anisotropic crystalline matrix.…”
Section: Peculiarities and Limitations Of The Model Of Elastic Propermentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Stiff pores could remain open at very high pressures, in agreement with Christensen (1974) who has shown that small amounts of high aspect ratio cracks may be preserved in rocks, even at pressures as high as 1 GPa. Ruiz & Azizov (2011) demonstrated, that the dependence of elastic wave velocities on depth (and on pressure) could be described with the same quality by considering a single set of pores with a depth-dependent aspect ratio. When anisotropic materials are considered, it is natural to expect that cracks with different aspect ratios may have different orientation distributions, and these orientation distributions do change with pressure as cracks close within the anisotropic crystalline matrix.…”
Section: Peculiarities and Limitations Of The Model Of Elastic Propermentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Attempts were made to explain this trend by two types of pores -soft and stiff -existing in the material (Shapiro, 2003;Pervukhina et al, 2010). With respect to pore closure with pressure, low-aspect-ratio pores could be considered as "soft" and spherical pores as "stiff" (Ruiz and Azizov, 2011).…”
Section: Linking Orientations To Anisotropy C15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus expected that for different shales with, e.g., different degrees of compaction, this ratio may be different. For example, in the study of Ruiz and Azizov (2011), the same two types of pores with aspect ratios f1∶1∶1g and f1∶1∶0.01g are used to describe elastic properties of a low-porosity Barnett Shale. However, in their models (featuring elastically isotropic mineral aggregates) the part of low-aspect-ratio pores in total porosity was less than 25%.…”
Section: Linking Orientations To Anisotropy C15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By combining seismic and logging data and using different rock physics models, it is possible to estimate the elastic information of a target reservoir and predict the distribution of oil, gas, and water (Khoshdel et al, 2022) [30]. In general, petrophysical parameters (such as porosity and fluid saturation) can be predicted from elastic parameters using different rock physics models, such as sandstone (Keys and Xu, 2002;Mavko et al, 2009;Dvorkin and Nur, 1996) [31][32][33], shale (Ruiz and Azizo, 2011) [34], carbonate (Xu and White, 1995;Xu and Payne, 2009) [35,36], and fracture (Schoenberg and Sayers, 1995;Bakulin et al, 2000) [37,38] reservoir models. Elastic parameters are commonly obtained with seismic inversion, which uses elastic information contained in seismic waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%