All Days 2016
DOI: 10.2118/182572-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tight Oil Field Development Optimization Based on Experience of Canadian Analogs

Abstract: The paper presents a study of field development optimization of the large tight oil field in West Siberia. The field is at an early development stage and is characterized by low permeability (less than 1 mD). It is developed by horizontal wells with multistage hydraulic fracturing. Analysis of available information about the field revealed the potential to improve field development efficiency. Field development analysis and optimization were carried out based on the experience of development of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the ultralow permeability and the micro-nanoscale pore and throat system, the oil recovery factors for an unconventional reservoir are typically low. Production decline of the wells drilled into low permeability formations is very fast, with 60% or more in the first production year according to reports. , Recovery factor by primary depletion such as solution gas drive without secondary recovery techniques is low and is usually 6–12% of the original oil in place (OOIP). When water injection is applied, the recovery factor may be twice higher, which is about 12–25% and even higher.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the ultralow permeability and the micro-nanoscale pore and throat system, the oil recovery factors for an unconventional reservoir are typically low. Production decline of the wells drilled into low permeability formations is very fast, with 60% or more in the first production year according to reports. , Recovery factor by primary depletion such as solution gas drive without secondary recovery techniques is low and is usually 6–12% of the original oil in place (OOIP). When water injection is applied, the recovery factor may be twice higher, which is about 12–25% and even higher.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%