Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms 2018
DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611975031.80
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tight Hardness for Shortest Cycles and Paths in Sparse Graphs

Abstract: Fine-grained reductions have established equivalences between many core problems withÕ(n 3 )-time algorithms on n-node weighted graphs, such as Shortest Cycle, All-Pairs Shortest Paths (APSP), Radius, Replacement Paths, Second Shortest Paths, and so on. These problems also haveÕ(mn)-time algorithms on m-edge n-node weighted graphs, and such algorithms have wider applicability. Are these mn bounds optimal when m n 2 ?Starting from the hypothesis that the minimum weight (2 + 1)-Clique problem in edge weighted gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
83
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The O(mn) time bound is widely believed to be the optimal combinatorial running time up to subpolynomial factors 1 . In fact, even improving the running time for approximate APSP for multiplicative stretch (1 + ) and additive stretch (2 − ) for any ∈ [0, 1] by a truly polynomial factor implies major breakthroughs for several long-standing problems [DHZ00, WW18,LWW18].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The O(mn) time bound is widely believed to be the optimal combinatorial running time up to subpolynomial factors 1 . In fact, even improving the running time for approximate APSP for multiplicative stretch (1 + ) and additive stretch (2 − ) for any ∈ [0, 1] by a truly polynomial factor implies major breakthroughs for several long-standing problems [DHZ00, WW18,LWW18].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hardness assumption we use is the ℓ-Uniform Hyperclique assumption used in prior works (see e.g. [18,1]):…”
Section: Conditional Lower Bounds For D-dimensionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypothesis is very believable for a variety of reasons. It is known (see [18]) that the natural extension of the techniques used to solve k-clique (in graphs) will not solve k-hyperclique in ℓ-uniform hypergraphs faster than n k . Moreover, there are known reductions from notoriously difficult problems such as Exact Weight k-Clique (a problem harder than Max Weight k-Clique) [1], Max ℓ-SAT and even harder Constrained Satisfaction Problems (CSPs) [27,18] to k-hyperclique in ℓ-uniform hypergraphs so that if the hypothesis is false, then all of these problems have surprisingly improved algorithms.…”
Section: Conditional Lower Bounds For D-dimensionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 : it is not possible to determine the existence of a 4-clique in a graph with n nodes in time O(n 3 ). This is a special case of the k-Clique Hypothesis [14], which states that detecting a clique in a graph with n nodes requires n Enumerating Answers to UCQs. Given a UCQ Q over some schema S, we denote by E Q the enumeration problem E R , where R is the binary relation between instances I over S and sets of mappings Q(I ).…”
Section: Hypergraphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A non-free-connex union of two CQs is intractable in the following cases: both CQs are intractable, or they both represent the same CQ up to a different projection. The hardness results presented here use problems with well-established assumptions on the lower bounds, such as Boolean matrix-multiplication [13] or finding a clique or a hyperclique in a graph [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%