2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.disc.2004.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tight bounds on maximal and maximum matchings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
54
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As ( ′ , ) = ( , ) for ∈ [3] and 4 ( ′ , ) < 4 ( , ) we obtain a contradiction to the lexicographical minimality of ( 1 ( , ), 2…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As ( ′ , ) = ( , ) for ∈ [3] and 4 ( ′ , ) < 4 ( , ) we obtain a contradiction to the lexicographical minimality of ( 1 ( , ), 2…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Various lower bounds on the matching number for regular graphs have appeared in the literature. For example, Biedl et al [2] proved that if is a cubic graph, then ′ ( ) ≥ (4 − 1)∕9. This result was generalized to regular graphs of higher degree by Henning and Yeo [7] (see also, O and West [14]).…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We continue this process for N time steps, and at each time step all tasks are required to migrate. We know that a perfect matching will exist at every time step from [8], leaving K 2 total migrations. In contrast, had the edges in all future time steps been known in advance, then the matching remaining in the last time step could have been chosen first, resulting in zero total migrations.…”
Section: Motivating Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%