1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.59.4195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tight-binding study of the CO chemisorption effect on cobalt magnetization

Abstract: By using a semiempirical self-consistent tight-binding scheme we study the effect of O and CO chemisorption on the Co͑0001͒ surface magnetization. Similar calculations are performed for the Co 13 and Co 55 clusters of high symmetry. The CO molecule in the atop position, but not in the bridge geometry, is effective in local magnetization quenching. In clusters magnetic phase transitions are observed as the Co-CO separation varies. When the separation is more than about 1.8 Å, the Co magnetization remains strong… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(46 reference statements)
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The core-shell model [41] has been reported to explain such type of behavior in case of metal and metal alloy nanoparticles. Besides this, chemisorption of surfactants on the surface of CoNi nanoparticles [17] may be another possible reason for decrease in saturation magnetization as compared to its bulk value. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The core-shell model [41] has been reported to explain such type of behavior in case of metal and metal alloy nanoparticles. Besides this, chemisorption of surfactants on the surface of CoNi nanoparticles [17] may be another possible reason for decrease in saturation magnetization as compared to its bulk value. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many interesting magnetic properties are exhibited by these nanoparticles compared to their bulk counterparts [6][7][8]. The magnetic properties of alloy nanoparticles depend on various factors such as size [6,9], shape [10], anisotropy [11][12][13], surface effects [6,13], crystal structure [1,13], composition [1,14,15], adsorption of surfactants [16,17] and magnetic interaction between particles [18,19]. Below certain critical size, non-interacting single domain magnetic nanoparticles exhibit superparamagnetism, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be attributed to adventitious oxygen adsorption and surface oxidation in some cases, but most of the time the electronic effects of M a n u s c r i p t 51 other coordinated ligands have to be considered. Theoretical calculations predict that chemisorption of CO on Co or Ni nanoparticles induces a drastic reduction of their surface atoms magnetic moment [299], [300], [301], while only a neglectable effect is expected from coordination of NH3 on the same clusters [302]. Studying this effect experimentally is far from simple as it demands a very strict control over the composition and surface chemistry of the NPs.…”
Section: Influence On Magnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Strange enough, however, theoretical analysis of the effect of the CO molecule upon magnetic properties of Co surfaces on the first-principle level is completely lacking. It was performed [28] only at the semi-empirical level for atop and bridge CO positions above Co(0 0 0 1) in not optimized geometries. The calculation predicts that CO molecule adsorbed at atop position drastically reduces magnetic moment of its Co nearest-neighbour, whereas the effect is very small for adsorption in the bridge position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%