The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72494-0_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tight-Binding Modeling of Charge Migration in DNA Devices

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A more accurate description requires us to model each nucleobase in a bp as an independent site as well as including the sugarphosphate backbone. 8 The hydrogen bonding between complementary bases is then described as an additional hopping term perpendicular to the DNA stack, [9][10][11][12][13] and appropriate on-site energies and hopping parameters for the backbone must be included as well. [14][15][16] The resulting models are essentially a planar projection ͑two dimensions͒ of the DNA structure with its double helix unwound, so that the successive bp's are lined up face to face along the strand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more accurate description requires us to model each nucleobase in a bp as an independent site as well as including the sugarphosphate backbone. 8 The hydrogen bonding between complementary bases is then described as an additional hopping term perpendicular to the DNA stack, [9][10][11][12][13] and appropriate on-site energies and hopping parameters for the backbone must be included as well. [14][15][16] The resulting models are essentially a planar projection ͑two dimensions͒ of the DNA structure with its double helix unwound, so that the successive bp's are lined up face to face along the strand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the Hamiltonian of usual two-leg ladder model including spin degree of freedom [17], with N the DNA length, c † jn = (c † jn↑ , c † jn↓ ) the creation operator of the spinor at the nth site of the jth chain of the ds-DNA, ε jn the on-site energy, t jn the intrachain hopping integral, and λ n the interchain hybridization interaction. +H.c.]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, systematic investigations (within a given experimental setup) on base sequence, length, and the temperature dependence of charge transport are still missing, so that the theoretical analysis of possible charge transport pathways faces big challenges [40]. Initial modeling of charge transport was mainly based on effective Hamiltonians with fixed electronic parameters and describing e.g hole transport through the highest occupied molecular orbitals (HOMO) of the bases [41][42][43][44][45][46][47] (see also [48,49] for recent reviews). Model Hamiltonians clearly offer the possibility to explore different charge transport scenarios in a relatively flexible way, but they also contain usually many parameters which are difficult to estimate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%