2015
DOI: 10.1090/conm/650/13042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tight and random nonorthogonal fusion frames

Abstract: Abstract. This paper continues the investigation of nonorthogonal fusion frames started in [7]. First we show that tight nonorthogonal fusion frames a relatively easy to com by. In order to do this we need to establish a classification of how to to wire a self adjoint operator as a product of (nonorthogonal) projection operators. We also discuss the link between nonorthogonal fusion frames and positive operator valued measures, we define and study a nonorthogonal fusion frame potential, and we introduce the id… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the next proposition, we recall the definition of fusion frames (see [17,18,19,31] and the references therein) and completeness for a system of orthogonal projectors. Definition 2.2.…”
Section: Main Results For General Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the next proposition, we recall the definition of fusion frames (see [17,18,19,31] and the references therein) and completeness for a system of orthogonal projectors. Definition 2.2.…”
Section: Main Results For General Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea, originating in [9, Corollary 5.2], is that among N subspaces of fixed dimension in C d , there must be at least a pair with "small" principal angles. This result has been generalized to subspaces with weights in [2,Theorem 3.4], and then to arbitrary positive semidefinite operators with fixed trace in [4,Proposition 4.1]. In the result below, we slightly generalize this last result, by removing the fixed trace condition.…”
Section: Decompositions and Welch-type Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 94%