2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2015.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tide, time and space: Scales of variation and influences on structuring and sampling beach clams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the components of variation were consistently greatest across the smallest spatial scale sampled; among replicate samples taken at each site on each day and they were also generally high for the factors Site and Day. These results exemplify the need for future assessments of beach clams to adequately account for small-scale variability in sampling strategies to avoid potential confounding of larger scale comparisons [ 33 ]. Small-scale spatial and temporal variability is not uncommon in benthic assemblages [ 41 43 ] and was expected; previous sampling over a hierarchy of scales identified that variability in the densities of clams was consistently greatest across the smallest spatial and temporal scales examined [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the components of variation were consistently greatest across the smallest spatial scale sampled; among replicate samples taken at each site on each day and they were also generally high for the factors Site and Day. These results exemplify the need for future assessments of beach clams to adequately account for small-scale variability in sampling strategies to avoid potential confounding of larger scale comparisons [ 33 ]. Small-scale spatial and temporal variability is not uncommon in benthic assemblages [ 41 43 ] and was expected; previous sampling over a hierarchy of scales identified that variability in the densities of clams was consistently greatest across the smallest spatial and temporal scales examined [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Clams were sampled across two habitats, the swash zone and the dry sand belt typically located between 10 and 30 m above the low-tide swash zone level on each beach. To account for small-scale temporal and spatial variability [ 33 ], in each of the three periods sampling was done across two randomly selected days in each of three randomly selected weeks, except for the swash habitat in Period 1 when only four days (two weeks) were sampled. On each sampling day, eight sites in the swash zone and another eight sights in the identified clam belt in the dry sand were selected at random on each beach, and at each of these locations, six replicate samples were taken [ 27 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swash zone sampling in Gray et al (2014) and in Ferguson et al (2015) was performed at low tide. Gray et al (2016a) explained that low tide ±3 h was convenient for driving along beaches to access sampling locations. Totterman (2019b) raised concerns that Gray’s (2016b, 2016c) counts were biased by seasonal changes in low tide zonation of D. deltoides .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clams are spatially structured species, patchily distributed in their living area (McLachlan et al 1996;Dugan and McLachlan 1999;Defeo 2003;Denadai et al 2005) and this pattern makes them challenging to sample (Gray 2016). Formers monitoring programs results in Arcachon bay confirm the patchy spatial structure of manila clams in this area, but also highlight a temporal variation of abundance and biomass between both campaigns (Sanchez et al 2014).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%