2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.12.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tide-induced fluctuations of salinity and groundwater level in unconfined aquifers – Field measurements and numerical model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
42
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Salinity and hydraulic head usually react more quickly in the USP than in the SW. For example, salinity at L2‐1 (Figure b) lags only slightly (∼0 h) behind tidal fluctuation (Figure a) due to the shallow depth of L2‐1 and very little time for seawater to infiltrate to L2‐1, whereas salinity at L3–5 (Figure b) lags ∼12 h behind tidal fluctuation (Figure a) due to its long flow path and deep location. The observations in this study are consistent with previous numerical simulations and field observations (Levanon et al, ; Liu et al, ). As for the variations of radium isotopes at L2‐1 (Figures c–e), they show consistent trends with tidal fluctuation and salinity variation except during the high tide when radium isotopes in the near‐surface area suffer from mixing loss induced by the infiltration of low radium seawater.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Salinity and hydraulic head usually react more quickly in the USP than in the SW. For example, salinity at L2‐1 (Figure b) lags only slightly (∼0 h) behind tidal fluctuation (Figure a) due to the shallow depth of L2‐1 and very little time for seawater to infiltrate to L2‐1, whereas salinity at L3–5 (Figure b) lags ∼12 h behind tidal fluctuation (Figure a) due to its long flow path and deep location. The observations in this study are consistent with previous numerical simulations and field observations (Levanon et al, ; Liu et al, ). As for the variations of radium isotopes at L2‐1 (Figures c–e), they show consistent trends with tidal fluctuation and salinity variation except during the high tide when radium isotopes in the near‐surface area suffer from mixing loss induced by the infiltration of low radium seawater.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The hourly changes in groundwater levels and conductivity (salinity) levels caused by the semidiurnal tidal pressure wave were also the most apparent groundwater signal in all collected datasets e.g., (Figures 5, 6 and 8). This dynamic is expected to be a common response on low-lying carbonate atoll islands and confirms previous studies on tide-induced fluctuations of salinity and groundwater level in unconfined aquifers [53].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Levanon et al [19,20] suggested that the tidal effect on the groundwater system comprises two main processes: (1) tidal forcing at the sea floor boundary and (2) attenuation at the groundwater level due to capillary effect. They showed that even though the pressure head wave propagation into the aquifer is relatively fast, the actual movement of the freshwater body, which is reflected by fluctuations of GWL and the salinity in the FSI, is slower since it is controlled by the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity within the capillary fringe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%