1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf02226659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tide and surge propagation off-shore in the Dowsing region of the North Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonlinear effects in the near-shore region generated higher harmonics of the M 2 tide and gave appreciable tide-surge interaction, as found in observations in this and other areas (e.g. Bobanovic et al 2005;Horsburgh and Wilson 2007;Kagan et al 2005;Pugh and Vassie 1976).…”
Section: Numerical Modelsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Nonlinear effects in the near-shore region generated higher harmonics of the M 2 tide and gave appreciable tide-surge interaction, as found in observations in this and other areas (e.g. Bobanovic et al 2005;Horsburgh and Wilson 2007;Kagan et al 2005;Pugh and Vassie 1976).…”
Section: Numerical Modelsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Inputs to the model included M 2 , S 2 , K 1 and O 1 tidal components (lunar semi diurnal, solar semi diurnal, lunisolar diurnal and lunar diurnal, respectively), wind data, and a southerly flowing Leeuwin Current of 0.1 m s -1 (Burling et al 2003). Other parameters included a standard bottom-friction factor of 0.0025 (Pugh & Vassie 1976) and a Coriolis factor of 6.3 × 10 -5 s -1…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requirement to perform a 6 month simulation is based upon the use of the synod period (the time for two tidal constituents to separate in time by a complete cycle, here for the S 2 and K2 tides) as a guide to the accuracy of the harmonic analysis method when applied to observational data. This is often referred to as the Rayleigh criterion [Pugh, 1989] Table 4 suggest that if any error of the order of + 1.5 cm s 4 (comparable with the error in the current meter data of order + 2 cm s -1, [Pugh and Vassie, 1976] can be tolerated, then the harmonic analysis of about 60 days of computed currents is sufficient, although for a higher accuracy a 90 day period is required.…”
Section: Influence Of Data Span Upon the Accuracy Of The Tidal Harmonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%